[issue29105] code or doc improvement for logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler
New submission from iMath: For class logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler(filename, mode='a', maxBytes=0, backupCount=0, encoding=None, delay=0) if backupCount is zero and maxBytes is non-zero, the log file size could exceed maxBytes, i.e. we are not able to restrict the log file size using RotatingFileHandler at this case . I suggest add the above description to the doc https://docs.python.org/3.6/library/logging.handlers.html#logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler If possible , set backupCount=1 by default to avoid this pitfall as much as possible. The doc right now just says "if either of maxBytes or backupCount is zero, rollover never occurs.", it is too difficult to understand the meaning of 'Rollover' to aviod the pitfall . -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 284277 nosy: docs@python, redstone-cold priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: code or doc improvement for logging.handlers.RotatingFileHandler type: enhancement versions: Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29105> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue29074] repr doesn't give full result for this re math result
New submission from iMath: I tested with Python 3.5.2 (v3.5.2:4def2a2901a5, Jun 25 2016, 22:01:18) [MSC v.1900 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 re.search(r'http://v.pptv.com/show/.*?\.html.+', 'http://v.pptv.com/show/2bwkox9SS4nsatI.html?rcc_src=P5') does give a match, but it show the result <_sre.SRE_Match object; span=(0, 54), match='http://v.pptv.com/show/2bwkox9SS4nsatI.html?rcc_s> missing rc=P5' in IDLE BTW, py2.7 works fine -- components: Regular Expressions messages: 284024 nosy: ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, redstone-cold priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: repr doesn't give full result for this re math result type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29074> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue32366] suggestion:html.escape(s, quote=True) escape \n to
New submission from iMath <redstone-c...@163.com>: It would be better if html.escape(s, quote=True) could escape linefeed to https://docs.python.org/3/library/html.html#html.escape -- components: XML messages: 308546 nosy: redstone-cold priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: suggestion:html.escape(s, quote=True) escape \n to type: enhancement ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue32366> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue30904] Python 3 logging HTTPHandler sends duplicate Host header
iMath <redstone-c...@163.com> added the comment: Yes, I met with the same bug, see the post for description and bug investigation https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43185804/using-httphandler-cause-django-server-side-shows-http-400-and-invalid-http-host/47434323#47434323 -- nosy: +redstone-cold ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue30904> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34221] Any plans to combine collections.OrderedDict with dict
New submission from iMath : Since Python 3.7，dicts remember the order that items were inserted, so any plans to combine collections.OrderedDict with dict? https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html?#collections.OrderedDict https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict BTW, I think it would be better to move "Dictionaries preserve insertion order" part at the end of the doc of https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#dict up below the doc for class dict(**kwarg) class dict(mapping, **kwarg) class dict(iterable, **kwarg) so that people won't miss the feature when consulting the doc -- messages: 322349 nosy: redstone-cold priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Any plans to combine collections.OrderedDict with dict type: enhancement ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34221> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34450] improve shutil.make_archive
New submission from iMath : The current behavior of shutil.make_archive caused many issues , the problem is mainly on the extracted archive directory hierarchy. These are the proofs: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51914467/directory-hierarchy-issue-when-using-shutil-make-archive https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32640053/compressing-directory-using-shutil-make-archive-while-preserving-directory-str https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41624800/shutil-make-archive-issue-dont-want-directories-included-in-zip-file https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50156657/unexpected-file-using-shutil-make-archive-to-compress-file For example , if I want to create a zip archive of the pip package (path specified by pip.__path__[0])), and need a directory named pip to hold the files and folders which originally reside in the pip package when unpacking the archive, then I need give root_dirparameter of shutil.make_archive the parent directory of the pippackage path (root_dir=Path(pip.__path__[0]).parent), and then the base_dir parameter the final path component of the pip package path(base_dir=Path(pip.__path__[0]).name) , so it is os.path.join(root_dir, base_dir) that specified the directory to archive , so weird !!! I suggest to change shutil.make_archive(base_name, format[, root_dir[, base_dir]]) to shutil.make_archive(base_name, format[, archived_dir[, archive_prfix]]) where archived_dirdenotes the path to be archived and archive_prfix denotes the common prefix of all files and directories in the archive (it is just a path component and we shouldn’t assume the existence of it on the file system). If the current behavior of shutil.make_archive won’t be changed , I’d suggest improve its doc, because so many people couldn’t grasp the use of shutil.make_archive even consulting the doc , these are the proofs: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45245079/python-how-to-use-shutil-make-archive https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30049201/how-to-compress-a-file-with-shutil-make-archive-in-python -- messages: 323829 nosy: redstone-cold priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: improve shutil.make_archive ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34450> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue34450] improve shutil.make_archive
iMath added the comment: one workaround is : if os.path.join(root_dir, base_dir) exists, use the current implementation , this is set for backwards-compatibility, if not exist, please consider the feature in my last post(maybe we should recommend Python users to follow this approach in the doc). -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue34450> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue27820] Possible bug in smtplib when initial_response_ok=False
iMath added the comment: I encountered the same issue , Dario D'Amico's changing works ! please fix the problem ! -- nosy: +redstone-cold ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue27820> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
