[issue23698] Multiprocessing.Manager: fix behavior and doc inconsistencies
Anand B Pillai added the comment: @sbt - Any comments on this ? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23698 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Changes by Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org: -- nosy: +docs@python ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Changes by Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org: -- assignee: - docs@python components: +Documentation ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23748] platform._uname_cache is writeable
Anand B Pillai added the comment: Hmmm... dear sir - what prevents you from adding an __all__ to the module with these cache variables excluded ? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23748] platform._uname_cache is writeable
Anand B Pillai added the comment: Closing is an easy fix, bet on my word this would appear as a different bug, thanks for your quickie fix! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23747] platform module exposes win32_ver function on posix systems
Anand B Pillai added the comment:
Similarly for mac_ver, java_ver etc.
platform.mac_ver()
('', ('', '', ''), '')
platform.java_ver()
('', '', ('', '', ''), ('', '', ''))
Maybe it is okay if these functions are present, but can't they raise an
exception or return None instead of returning these funny tuples when empty
strings ?
I am surprised at Python's inconsistency in such things. For example,
import winsound
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ImportError: No module named 'winsound'
Works as expected on Linux. In the same vein, these functions shouldn't be
present as well IMHO - I agree this is debatable of course.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23747
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Anand B Pillai added the comment: On second thoughts, why have such a function if it works correctly only when executed from source Cpython folder using source CPython executable and not otherwise ? Cuz if I am calling it like that I already KNOW that I am in such an environment. Possibly this is an internal function to be used by developers to find out if they are in such an environment. IMHO Then - make it private (not callable outside) or drop it altogether. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
New submission from Anand B Pillai: On Python 3.5.0a1+ built from source, import sysconfig sysconfig.is_python_build() False sysconfig.is_python_build(True) False sysconfig._PROJECT_BASE '/opt/bin' import sys sys._home The problem is, when sys._home is None, this function uses _is_python_source_dir(_PROJECT_BASE) . In this case the _PROJECT_BASE is clearly passed wrongly as '/opt/bin'. That is the INSTALL_PREFIX, not _PROJECT_BASE . Let us do a small hack and set _PROJECT_BASE to the folder where I build this Python version. # Of course this can't be reproduced but you get the idea. sysconfig._PROJECT_BASE='/home/anand/code/cpython/' sysconfig.is_python_build() True The documentation says, sysconfig.is_python_build() Return True if the current Python installation was built from source. which is clearly in conflict with what it is doing. From a quick look at sysconfig.py it looks like it is calculating _PROJECT_BASE wrongly. I can give a patch for this, but first I am more interested in finding out what this function is supposed to do - why have this function if you are not able to get the details of the build environment from the built interpreter ? Clearly it is not doing that here. The conclusions are part of the attached file in comments. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 238993 nosy: pythonhacker priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Anand B Pillai added the comment: Lib/test/test_asdl_parser.py:12:if not sysconfig.is_python_build(): As I guessed - it is used internally by unit tests and possibly has no other significan audience. It is best to document this clearly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23748] platform._uname_cache is writeable
Anand B Pillai added the comment: I am changing the type to security as I dont think this is a behaviour issue. -- type: behavior - security ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23748 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38649/sysconfig_test.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23748] platform._uname_cache is writeable
New submission from Anand B Pillai:
import platform
print 'Actual =',platform.uname()
Actual = ('Linux', 'toshiba-laptop', '3.13.0-24-generic', '#47-Ubuntu SMP Fri
May 2 23:30:00 UTC 2014', 'x86_64', 'x86_64')
import hack_uname
# Someone imports my module unaware of the hack (see attached file)
platform.uname()
('Limux', 'hacker-laptop', '11.15.0-28000-absurd', '#1 - FunkyDistro SMMP
Fry Feb 30 2015 23:59:00 UTC 2015', 'x866_64', 'x866_64')
Fix - Make the global _uname_cache inaccessible via the module and hence
unwriteable. I can provide a patch - it is kind of easy fix.
I think this might also be a security issue since if someone is writing a
significant piece of code based on the platform it can screw up the system - or
his web application if a piece of code like this is introduced in a module via
his chain of imports by a malicious hacker.
--
components: Library (Lib)
files: hack_uname.py
messages: 239005
nosy: pythonhacker
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: platform._uname_cache is writeable
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38652/hack_uname.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23748
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23747] platform module exposes win32_ver function on posix systems
New submission from Anand B Pillai:
import platform
platform.system()
'Linux'
platform.win32_ver()
('', '', '', '')
Why is this function even exposed on Linux ? It should be conditionally exposed
only on win32 platforms.
Funny that this is coming from the module named platform itself :)
--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 238995
nosy: pythonhacker
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: platform module exposes win32_ver function on posix systems
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23747
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23746] sysconfg.is_python_build() is buggy
Anand B Pillai added the comment: Thanks. From current documentation it isn't clear. Agree to make this a doc bug then. It should also be made clear this would work only for the executable built in the source directory. As in, (Running from the source folder using source Python executable). anand@toshiba-laptop:~/code/cpython$ ./python Python 3.5.0a1+ (default:656543a2ad75, Mar 3 2015, 22:56:27) [GCC 4.9.2] on linux Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import sysconfig sysconfig.is_python_build() True -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23746 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23698] Fix inconsistencies in behaviour and document it correctly for multiprocessing.Manager facade
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: -- title: Fix documentation for multiprocessing.Manager - Fix inconsistencies in behaviour and document it correctly for multiprocessing.Manager facade ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23698 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23698] Fix documentation for multiprocessing.Manager
Anand B Pillai added the comment: Is your patch uploaded anywhere ? Anyway, before thinking whether this should be a patch or doc fix, one needs multiprocessing module author to possibly comment on the right behaviour expected here. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23698 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23698] Fix documentation for multiprocessing.Manager
New submission from Anand B Pillai: multiprocessing.Manager seems to have an inconsistency in behaviour/documentation or both. The behaviour inconsistency is documented in the attached test script which should run for both Python2 and Python3. Briefly, multiprocessing.managers.BaseManager class starts a Python subprocess only after a call to its start method. Whereas its subclass, multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager does at the time of object creation. This is undocumented and against the base classe's documented behaviour. Also, the SyncManager is more commonly advertised via the facade multiprocessing.Manager() which is again at odds with the BaseManager's interface in that, 1. It takes no arguments (Python2) and different arguments (Python 3). 2. You can't call start on it but you can call start if you initialize it via multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager directly (!) 3. Even if you can't call a start on it, apparently you can shut it down via a call to shutdown 4. When you try to start such a manager you get a strange AssertionError complaining the state is not INITIAL. A better error is required here. Please find the attached file for all the sequence of tests done. Suggested changes are, 1. Fix the inconsistency in documented behaviour between SyncManager and its base class. Either don't start the child process upon object creation or document it. 2. Fix the inconsistency in SyncManager object creation interface and behaviour via mulitprocessing.Manager() and directly via multiprocessing.managers.SyncManager(...) . One should be able to start both objects cleanly. And the former should also take the address argument. If not document it properly. 3. The AssertionError when trying to start the SyncManager object obtained via a call to multiprocessing.Manager() looks like a bug. It should be fixed - otherwise a bette error should be raised and documentation updated. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Library (Lib) files: mp_test.py messages: 238379 nosy: docs@python, pythonhacker priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Fix documentation for multiprocessing.Manager type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5, Python 3.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38537/mp_test.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23698 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15443] datetime module has no support for nanoseconds
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +pythonhacker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15443 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21574] Port image types detections from PIL to the imghdr module
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +pythonhacker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21574 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Okay. Verified as working. Thank you! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7150] datetime operations spanning MINYEAR give bad results
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Can someone update this issue ? Is the 2nd patch tested... ? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7150 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8319] HTMLparser does not handle call to handle_data when a tag contains no data.
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +pythonhacker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue8319 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7191] Odd behaviour with zlib.decompressobj optional parameter wbits
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Ok, so you think a documentation update is enough ? Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7191 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11035/gzip_patch.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11044/gzip.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Changes by Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file11050/gzip_svn_diff.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Uploading fresh gzip.py SVN diff with a minor change, i.e accepting a regular string as argument, aka zlib.compress. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15282/gzip.py.svndiff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Uploading rst documentation svn diff for module. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15283/gzip.rst.svndiff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Ok, I will add this. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7150] datetime operations spanning MINYEAR give bad results
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: The problem seems to be in the normalize_date function in datetimemodule.c. It is checking for a valid year range, but not checking for a valid month or day range. I have a patch which fixes this problem. It checks for month range (1=m=12) and day range(1=d=31). Here is Python with the patch. an...@anand-laptop:~/projects/python/py3k$ ./python Python 3.2a0 (py3k:75627, Oct 25 2009, 14:28:21) [GCC 4.3.3] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/anand/.pythonrc, line 2, in module import readline ImportError: No module named readline import datetime t0=datetime.datetime(1,1,1) d1,d2,d3=map(datetime.timedelta, range(1,4)) t0-d1 Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: date value out of range t0-d2 Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: date value out of range t0-d3 Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: date value out of range d0=datetime.timedelta(0) t0-d0 datetime.datetime(1, 1, 1, 0, 0) Svn diff is attached. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file15194/datetimemodule.c.svndiff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7150 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: Can we include this for the next release ? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7150] datetime operations spanning MINYEAR give bad results
Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com added the comment: The issue is present in Python 3.0 and 2.5 as well. Python 2.5.1 (r251:54863, Jul 17 2008, 13:21:31) [GCC 4.3.1 20080708 (Red Hat 4.3.1-4)] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. import datetime t0=datetime.datetime(1,1,1) d1,d2,d3=map(datetime.timedelta, range(1,4)) t0-d1 Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module OverflowError: date value out of range t0-d2 datetime.datetime(1, 0, 255, 0, 0) I think this is bug in datetime for all Python versions -- nosy: +pythonhacker ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7150 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7191] Odd behaviour with zlib.decompressobj optional parameter wbits
New submission from Anand B Pillai abpil...@gmail.com: import zlib help(zlib.decompressobj) Help on built-in function decompressobj in module zlib: decompressobj(...) decompressobj([wbits]) -- Return a decompressor object. Optional arg wbits is the window buffer size. I experimented with this parameter and by trial and error found out that it accepts only values from 8 to 15 inclusive. z=zlib.decompressobj(1) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module ValueError: Invalid initialization option z=zlib.decompressobj(7) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module ValueError: Invalid initialization option z=zlib.decompressobj(16) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module ValueError: Invalid initialization option z1=zlib.decompressobj(8) z2=zlib.decompressobj(15) Now to the odd part. Let us create another decompressobj without any parameter. z3=zlib.decompressobj() Now compress some data. c=zlib.compress(This is a medium line of text) Decompress with z2 works fine. z3.decompress(c) b'This is a medium line of text' Decompress with z2 is also fine. z2.decompress(c) b'This is a medium line of text' However with z1 it fails. z1.decompress(c) Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module zlib.error: Error -3 while decompressing: invalid window size In fact, only the optional value of 15 seems to work for wbits, every other legal value (8-14) fails giving the same error. I tried this with other random strings with same effect. Either there is no need to expose this as a parameter or there could be a bug with how this parameter is used, which has to be fixed. In either case, documentation on this parameter has to be improved and legal range of values should be provided. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 94386 nosy: pythonhacker severity: normal status: open title: Odd behaviour with zlib.decompressobj optional parameter wbits type: behavior versions: Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7191 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Hi Gregory, Let me know if I can help out some way in testing the #3797 patches on various platforms. Regards, --Anand ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Does py3k list/barry have this bug in their radar for rc2 ? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Two remarks: 1. Some functions in Modules/zipimport.c (get_data) will now receive PyBytes, but zipimporter_get_source handle them as PyByteArray. Does zipimport still work at all with this patch? 2. There are other places where PyString_FromString was (incorrectly IMO) replaced with PyByteArray_FromString: - Modules/_dbmmodule.c - Modules/mmapmodule.c - Modules/ossaudiodev.c - Modules/zipimport.c (as noted above) - PC/winreg.c - Python/marshal.c Hmmm...but AFAIK zlib changes only affect zipimport directly. I wonder whether these other instances have bugs reported and are being tracked for the release. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks. Will this make into beta3 ? ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Any updates ? The py3k list is also very silent since the week-end...Thanks! ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Thanks. The file I uploaded was not an actual patch but just how the functions would appear in the gzip module, to illustrate the code. I can make an actual patch to gzip.py with docstrings, unit-tests and taking care of your other comments. Do you think this will be in time for Python 3.0 ? I can do this right away. ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: I have uploaded the actual patch file which can be applied against the gzip.py module. I did not modify the _test() function since it is written for testing file compression. I can modify test_gzip.py if this patch is accepted. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11044/gzip.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Hi, I have a patch ready for this to be applied to zlibmodule.c. The patch is attached. I have tested it and it is working fine. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11047/zlibmodule.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Uploading svn diff for zlibmodule.c. Btw, how do I add unit tests for a fix ? You want me to create a simple test file and upload it here, or is there a standard procedure for this ? Please advise. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11049/zlibmodule_svn_diff.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Uploading the svn diff. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11050/gzip_svn_diff.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Ok. I added two tests for checking the type of the returned object for zlib.compress and zlib.decompress in test_zlib.py in the py3k branch. Btw, my code uses assertEqual(type(...), bytes). Is this the proper way of type checking in py3k ? I could not see any formal type for bytes type in the types module. Attaching the svn diff for test_zlib.py . Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11051/test_zlib_svn_diff.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Added test case in test_gzip.py. Attaching svn diff of the same. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11052/test_gzip_svn_diff.patch ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3492] Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray
New submission from Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED]: import zlib s='This is a string' sc=zlib.compress(s) sc bytearray(b'x\x9c\x0b\xc9\xc8,V\x00\xa2D\x85\xe2\x92\xa2\xcc\xbct\x00/\xc2\x05\xcd') zlib.decompress(sc) bytearray(b'This is a string') This is wrong behavior as compress functions should return byte ,not a bytearray. Same for decompress. -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 70625 nosy: pythonhacker severity: normal status: open title: Zlib compress/decompress functions returning bytearray type: behavior versions: Python 3.0 ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3488] Provide compress/uncompress functions on the gzip module
Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Uploading a file containing two functions which can be used to provide compress/uncompress on gzip. This is not a patch to gzip.py, but a stand-alone file. It this looks fine, I will make a patch. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file11035/gzip_patch.py ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue3488 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2582] Unpickling of range objects fail in Py3k
New submission from Anand B Pillai [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Unpickling of range objects is throwing an exception in Python 3.0 -- components: Interpreter Core, Library (Lib) files: bugdemo.py messages: 65157 nosy: pythonhacker severity: normal status: open title: Unpickling of range objects fail in Py3k versions: Python 3.0 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9981/bugdemo.py __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue2582 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
