Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Just noticed this is missing from What's new in Python 3.3:
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html.
Should I submit a patch for that?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Ah ok, just curious. Thanks!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14204
Changes by Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +colinmarc
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13344
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
More updates to the patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24797/npn_patch_py3.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14204
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Updated patch.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24786/npn_patch_py3.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14204
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's an updated patch against 3.3.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24775/npn_patch_py3.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14204
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Oops, I had my vim configured wrong and left a few tab characters in there.
Here's another updated patch =)
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24777/npn_patch_py3.diff
___
Python tracker rep
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's the OpenSSL code I referenced for my implementation. It's an excerpt of
ssl/lib_ssl.c, starting at line 1514.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24778/npn_openssl_ref.c
___
Python
New submission from Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com:
Recent versions of OpenSSL (1.0.1 and greater) support a new extension to
SSL/TLS called Next Protocol Negotiation, defined here:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-02.
The extension allows servers and clients
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
If I ported it to 3.3 or 3.4, would it then be backported to 2.7? Or is there
zero chance of that either? If so, why? I apologize, I'm new to the process.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Colin Marc colinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Re the IETF draft: I'm not sure. However, I didn't actually have to implement
the specification at all - that was all handled by OpenSSL. My patch just calls
the appropriate SSL_CTX_* methods.
Thanks for the tip. I'm still interested
11 matches
Mail list logo
