[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

Gergely Kálmán added the comment: No, indeed this is a lot better. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue6560> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailin

[issue6560] socket sendmsg(), recvmsg() methods

Gergely Kálmán added the comment: On 05/22/11 03:14, Brian May wrote: > Brian May added the comment: > > What needs to happen to get recvmsg() supported in Python? > > recvmsg() is required to get get transparent UDP proxies working under Linux > using tproxy, the code ne

[issue10527] multiprocessing.Pipe problem: "handle out of range in select()"

Gergely Kálmán added the comment: And this is the patch that I wrote. It applies to python 3.2. Hope this helps Gergely Kalman -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file19814/multiproc.patch ___ Python tracker <h

[issue10527] multiprocessing.Pipe problem: "handle out of range in select()"

New submission from Gergely Kálmán : Hello, I have a code that uses multiprocessing.Pipe to communicate with subprocesses. Spawning 500 subprocesses this way works like a charm, but when spawning about 600 of them the pipe ends raise the exception: "handle out of range in select(

[issue10099] socket.fromfd() documentation problem

Gergely Kálmán added the comment: You are perfectly right, the docs are pretty clear. Although fromfd means (or at least to me) to "attach object to fd" and not "duplicate then attach to the duplicate". If someone forgets this particular behaviour and thinks that the f