[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Juarez Bochi added the comment: I've updated the patch based on ezio.melotti and berkerpeksag reviews (thanks). It's still missing the modifications proposed on msg107402. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26452/issue1100942_pure2.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Changes by Juarez Bochi : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26445/issue1100942_pure.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Juarez Bochi added the comment: Sorry. I updated my patch again to fix the exception message for time.strptime in the pure Python version. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26446/issue1100942_pure.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Changes by Juarez Bochi : Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file26440/issue1100942_pure.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Juarez Bochi added the comment: I've updated my patch with the tests for datetime.time.strptime that were missing and also its pure Python implementation. The previous diff also had some issues that I've fixed now: duplicated datetime.strptime method definition in c and the pure python docstring state that date.strpdate was a method and not a constructor. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26445/issue1100942_pure.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1100942] Add datetime.time.strptime and datetime.date.strptime
Juarez Bochi added the comment:
I have updated the patches since they were not applying cleanly and included a
pure Python implementation that was missing.
It has the same issues that were mentioned on msg107402.
Do you have any suggestions? I'm planning to block the formats that are not
allowed and raise Exceptions like suggested before:
>>> date.strptime('01', '%M')
...
"'%M' is not valid in date format specification."
--
nosy: +Juarez.Bochi
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26440/issue1100942_pure.diff
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
