Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
Andrew, thank you!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue38019>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
Andrew, it would be nice to have it fixed within 3.8. Hope you'll find time for
this.
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/is
Change by Marat Sharafutdinov :
--
title: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '_add_reader' /
'_remove_reader' -> asyncio subprocess AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no
attribute '_add_reader' / '_re
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov :
I'm trying to use dwdiff (https://os.ghalkes.nl/dwdiff.html) to compare two
text files. While running subprocess I'm getting the following errors:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test_dwdiff.py", line 17, in
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
Thank you for the patch, Victor!
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36629>
___
___
Python-bugs-list m
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
I see this error on my local Bamboo CI (runs on CentOS 7).
--
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov :
==
FAIL: test_imap4_host_default_value (test.test_imaplib.TestImaplib)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov :
I'm trying to build Python 3.7.2 within official CentOS 7.6.1810 image
(https://hub.docker.com/_/centos) and getting the following error during
testing:
==
FAIL: test_attri
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
Concerning the example adding a jitter is useful, thanks!
But anyway in case there will be something not constant as sleeping for 1 sec
is, the problem will continue to appear.
--
___
Python tracker
<ht
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
Does this mean that GC uses most part of CPU time so the loop blocks?
And another question: do you have any plans to optimize the loop so it would be
possible to run really lot of tasks in parallel?
Thanks
Marat Sharafutdinov added the comment:
But why if I use multiprocessing (run 100 tasks by 100 workers) it still
continue blocking loop within some workers? Are 100 tasks "a lot of work" for
asyncio loop?
```python
import asyncio
from multiprocessing import Process
worker_c
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov :
I want to schedule a lot of parallel tasks, but it becomes slow with loop
blocking:
```python
import asyncio
task_count = 1
async def main():
for x in range(1, task_count + 1):
asyncio.ensure_future(f(x))
async def f(x):
if x
Change by Marat Sharafutdinov :
--
versions: +Python 3.7 -Python 3.6
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issue31943>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailin
Change by Marat Sharafutdinov :
--
title: Add asyncio.Handle.cancelled() and asyncio.TimerHandle.when -> Add
asyncio.Handle.cancelled() method
___
Python tracker
<https://bugs.python.org/issu
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov :
It would be handy to access the loop's time the Handle's callback will be
called at if you are using delayed calls with "delay" (not "when") argument.
Also it is useful to know whether the call was cancelled
New submission from Marat Sharafutdinov:
Should be 3.0 instead of 2.5
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: pep-0344-version.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 263667
nosy: decaz, docs@python
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Fix PEP 344 Python
16 matches
Mail list logo
