Michael Durso <rbprogram...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I added more commits to the PR based on your comments. Although I cannot
figure out why on the new Process objects create Threads that do not get
cleaned up.
--
___
Python tracke
Michael Durso <rbprogram...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hi Antoine, were you able to check out the pull request? I'd like to get the
issues resolved so the code can be merged into the next version.
Thanks!
--
___
Python tracke
Michael Durso <rbprogram...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hi Antoine, no worries for the delay.
I've been looking into why the AppVeyor check is failing. I believe it to be
an issue with the test harness in that it changes the environment during the
tests, but only in the Windows ca
Change by Michael Durso <rbprogram...@gmail.com>:
--
keywords: +patch
pull_requests: +5104
stage: -> patch review
___
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.pyt
New submission from Michael Durso <rbprogram...@gmail.com>:
This is more of an issue with socketserver rather than multiprocessing. I
could not find socketserver experts to add to the nosy list, but I've included
the multiprocessing experts for completeness.
Under specific cond
