Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:15:05PM +, R. David Murray wrote:
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
Ralf, thanks very much for this patch. I'm considering applying it.
Given that the current code breaks
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
Fine, I see what you mean, this involves very careful reading of the RFC
and could have been a little more verbose ...
Right. Should have been a ')'
Adding the RFC tests would be great (patches gladly accepted). Fixes
for ones we fail
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
enclosed please find a fixed patch -- decode_header consolidates
multiple encoded strings with the same encoding into a single entry in
the returned parts.
--
Dr. Ralf Schlatterbeck Tel: +43/2243/26465-16
Open Source
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
Attached please find a patch that
- keeps all spaces between non-encoded and encoded parts
- doesn't create spaces between non-encoded and encoded parts in case
these are already there or not needed (because they are non-ctext
characters
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
I've been bitten by this too (in python up to 2.7 in roundup the bug-tracker).
We're currently using a workaround that re-inserts spaces, see git on
roundup.sourceforge.net file mailgw.py method _decode_header_to_utf8
RFC2047 even has
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
maybe it would be a good start to include the examples at the end of RFC2047
into the regression tests? These examples at least support the case that a '?'
may immediately follow an encoded string:
encoded form
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:52:51AM +, STINNER Victor wrote:
Can't you only work with Unicode and avoid the MBCS encoding?
I'm trying to build a windows binary package on Linux. This usually
works fine -- as long as the package
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
I've just been bitten by this when trying to do a new release of roundup, why
not make the mbcs codec available on non-windows platforms as has been proposed
(and rejected) in issue1251921 -- any non-technical reasons for not including
Ralf Schlatterbeck r...@runtux.com added the comment:
2.6 already produces a .linux-i686.exe package instead of .win32.exe when
running bdist_wininst. I've now used python2.5 for producing a binary windows
installer for roundup.
--
nosy: +runtux
versions: +Python 2.6
