[issue17552] socket.sendfile()
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue17552> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17428] replace readdir to readdir_r in function posix_listdir
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: That text was from the POSIX 2008 spec: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/readdir.html The following text from my copy of the readdir manpage gives an indication of how you *should* allocate struct dirent when using readdir_r: """ Since POSIX.1 does not specify the size of the d_name field, and other nonstandard fields may precede that field within the dirent structure, portable applications that use readdir_r() should allocate the buffer whose address is passed in entry as follows: name_max = pathconf(dirpath, _PC_NAME_MAX); if (name_max == -1) /* Limit not defined, or error */ name_max = 255; /* Take a guess */ len = offsetof(struct dirent, d_name) + name_max + 1; entryp = malloc(len); (POSIX.1 requires that d_name is the last field in a struct dirent.) """ I hope that helps -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue17428> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17428] replace readdir to readdir_r in function posix_listdir
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Hi, There shouldn't be a problem with the existing implementation since, according to posix: """ The pointer returned by readdir() points to data which may be overwritten by another call to readdir() on the same directory stream. This data is not overwritten by another call to readdir() on a different directory stream. """ Since each call to listdir() opens a different directory stream, this shouldn't be a problem. Also, when using readdir_r(), struct dirent should not be allocated on the stack since the last field may be an unspecified size. See the following for further reading about this: http://elliotth.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/how-not-to-use-readdirr3.html http://womble.decadent.org.uk/readdir_r-advisory.html Regards -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue17428> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16853] add a Selector to the select module
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > Ross, the select() result for a large number of ready FDs was > completely skewed because of a bug spotted by Antoine (complexity > was much worse than it ought to be). Ah, that makes a little more sense now. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16853> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16853] add a Selector to the select module
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Interesting benchmark. There is no gain for epoll with a large number of ready fds (as expected) but at least it is no worse than poll. Poll offers a large improvement on select, in this case. $ ./python selector_bench.py -r 2 -m 1000 -t pipe Trying with 2 ready FDs out of 1000, type pipe 0.004317363000154728 0.08897221900042496 0.155811747055 $ ./python selector_bench.py -r 100 -m 1000 -t pipe Trying with 100 ready FDs out of 1000, type pipe 0.1106707402169 0.18777027299984184 0.3015780589866 $ ./python selector_bench.py -r 1000 -m 1000 -t pipe Trying with 1000 ready FDs out of 1000, type pipe 1.08963231099915 1.69247998987 8.283167362000313 -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16853> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16853] add a Selector to the select module
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16853> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16850] Atomic open + close-and-exec
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16850> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16698] test_posix.test_getgroups fails on some systems
New submission from Ross Lagerwall: test_posix.test_getgroups() fails on some systems: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Mountain%20Lion%20%5BSB%5D%203.2 This could be related to #16661. -- components: Tests messages: 177601 nosy: rosslagerwall priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: test_posix.test_getgroups fails on some systems type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16698> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16661] test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: getgrouplist() is new in 3.3. Those failures are from getgroups() failing. I'll open a separate issue for that. -- status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16661> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16661] test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16661> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16661] test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Is that fixed now? I simplified the test to check for a non-empty list being returned. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16661> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16661] test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I wouldn't think so. A call to setgroups can add or remove groups for the calling process. If it removes groups, then getgrouplist() won't return a subset of getgroups(). -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16661> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16661] test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: It seems like getgrouplist returns the information from the system database whereas getgroups (and consequently id -G) returns the supplementary groups for the calling process. I'm not exactly sure how getgrouplist() can be effectively tested then. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall title: test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems - incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results -> test_posix.test_getgrouplist fails on some systems -incorrectly comparing getgroups and getgrouplist results ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16661> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16639] not your all issuse send
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- resolution: -> invalid status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16639> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16262] srcdir != builddir builds fail, if hg is not installed
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall nosy: +rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.2, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16262> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue16140] subprocess.Popen the os.close calls in _execute_child can raise an EBADF exception
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue16140> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15876] test_curses refleak
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15876> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15876] test_curses refleak
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: This didn't get picked up by Antoine's daily refleak test run because test curses only runs when stdout is a TTY. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15876> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15876] test_curses refleak
New submission from Ross Lagerwall: [1/1] test_curses beginning 6 repetitions 123456 . test_curses leaked [1, 1, 1] references, sum=3 1 test failed: test_curses [154814 refs] -- assignee: rosslagerwall messages: 169973 nosy: rosslagerwall priority: low severity: normal status: open title: test_curses refleak type: resource usage ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15876> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15798] subprocess.Popen() fails if 0, 1 or 2 descriptor is closed
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I sent a review through on rietveld; I'm attaching a patch with the changes so that it compiles and passes the tests. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27053/issue15798_v2.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15798> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15798] subprocess.Popen() fails if 0, 1 or 2 descriptor is closed
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The attached patch + test seems to fix the issue. It's not very elegant. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27042/issue15798.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15798> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15798] subprocess.Popen() fails if 0, 1 or 2 descriptor is closed
Ross Lagerwall added the comment:
It's caused by the following check in _posixsubprocess.c:
if (close_fds && errpipe_write < 3) { /* precondition */
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "errpipe_write must be >= 3");
return NULL;
}
which was written by Gregory P. Smith in 2010 (adding to nosy list).
I'm not entirely sure why this check is here, presumably its due to the way
close_fds=True is handled.
The close fds logic is also hardcoded to close fds from 3 upwards,.
--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue15798>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15777] test_capi refleak
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15777> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15777] test_capi refleak
New submission from Ross Lagerwall: results for fa745ed89b7a on branch "default" test_capi leaked [2, 2, 2] references, sum=6 Command line was: ['./python', '-m', 'test.regrtest', '-uall', '-R', '3:3:/home/antoine/cpython/refleaks/reflogEr4Oyp', '-x'] A fix is in progress... -- assignee: rosslagerwall messages: 168993 nosy: rosslagerwall priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: test_capi refleak type: resource usage versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15777> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15739] Python crashes with "Bus error: 10"
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Sorry, I didn't mean that it's impossible; I meant that it shouldn't happen and it should be fixed :-) Unfortunately I don't have access to an OS X box to test. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15739> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15739] Python crashes with "Bus error: 10"
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Well the app has an infinite recursion. This shows on Fedora Linux 17: """ Request Method: GET Request URL:http://127.0.0.1:8000/ Django Version: 1.4 Exception Type: RuntimeError Exception Value: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object Exception Location: /tmp/dg/django_select2/fields.py in __init__, line 146 Python Executable: /home/ross/src/python/2.7/python Python Version: 2.7.1 ... """ Of course, this shouldn't cause a bus error in Python. Perhaps try a different build of Python or try building it yourself? -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15739> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15548] Mention all new os functions in What's New in Python 3.3
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Attached is a diff between dir(os) in 3.2 and 3.3 -- keywords: +patch nosy: +rosslagerwall Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26676/oschanges.diff ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15548> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10812] Add some posix functions
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I can't actually remember why I disabled waitid for OS X - that was message was rather a long time ago :-( Unfortunately, I don't currently have access to an OS X machine to test it. A google search shows the following comment in the v8 javascript engine: // We're disabling usage of waitid in Mac OS X because it doens't work for us: // a parent process hangs on waiting while a child process is already a zombie. // See http://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=401. Do you have access to test an older release like Leopard? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10812> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7996] concurrency problem in regrtest -jX
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed superseder: -> thread-safety issue in regrtest.main() ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7996> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15447] A file is not properly closed by webbrowser._invoke
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Are there any webbrowser unit tests? (this could probably use the new subprocess.DEVNULL constant in 3.3) -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15447> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14826] urllib2.urlopen fails to load URL
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: It looks like this broke the build bots: http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/AMD64%20Ubuntu%20LTS%202.7/builds/66/steps/test/logs/stdio -- assignee: -> orsenthil nosy: +rosslagerwall status: closed -> open ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14826> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15277] Fix resource leak in support.py:_is_ipv6_enabled
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Ah, I see you've already opened a new issue for that (issue15284). -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15277> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15277] Fix resource leak in support.py:_is_ipv6_enabled
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Thanks. test_socket seems to be broken in all branches when running with net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1 but I'll open a new issue for that. -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall nosy: +rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15277> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15200] Faster os.walk
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: This looks like the kind of optimization that depends hugely on what kernel you're using. Maybe on FreeBSD/Solaris/whatever, standard os.walk() is faster? If this micro-optimization were to be accepted, someone would have to be keen enough to test it is different ways on many different versions of every platform to conclusively prove that it is faster in general. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15200> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15044] _dbm not building on Fedora 17
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Yeah, after I submitted the patch, I was unsure if that was a good idea or if it should try and use gdbm in native mode if possible. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15044> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15044] _dbm not building on Fedora 17
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Attached is a patch which fixes the issue on Fedora 17. If this doesn't break other OSes I'll commit it for 2.7, 3.2 and 3.3. -- keywords: +patch versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25943/gdbm.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15044> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15044] _dbm not building on Fedora 17
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The gdbm provided with Fedora 17 provides /usr/include/ndbm.h. This makes setup.py think that it should try link with -lndbm when it actually requires -lgdbm_compat. A workaround is to specify --with-dbmliborder=gdbm to force gdbm to be used. I'll try and make a patch for this. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue15044> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14443] Distutils test_bdist_rpm failure
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Unfortunately, it seems like it's still failing on the RHEL 6 buildbot. -- status: pending -> open ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14443> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14890] typo in difflib
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Yeah, I'm pretty sure it means if and only if. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14890> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1191964] asynchronous Subprocess
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > Personally, I would factor out the code for Popen.communicate() in to a > > Communicator class which wraps a Popen object and has a method > >communicate(input, timeout=None) -> (bytes_written, output, error) How would this differ from the normal communicate()? It seems like there are two different ideas for why people want an "asynchronous subprocess": One is that they want to use communicate() but not be limited by memory issues. I think a good API for this case is an asyncore style API or like the one from the patch in issue1260171. Another use case is for an expect-type interface where you read and write based on a timeout or some kind of delimiter like a newline. These should probably be addressed independently. See also issue10482. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1191964] asynchronous Subprocess
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1191964] asynchronous Subprocess
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- assignee: astrand -> ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1260171] subprocess: more general (non-buffering) communication
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Closed issue14872 as a duplicate of this. -- assignee: astrand -> nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue1260171> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14872] subprocess is not safe from deadlocks
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: See also issue1260171. Closing as a duplicate of that. -- resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed superseder: -> subprocess: more general (non-buffering) communication type: -> enhancement ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14872> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14872] subprocess is not safe from deadlocks
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Well if you're *certain* that the process is only using one stream, then you can just use read/write on that stream. If not, it probably means you have to use either threads or select/poll. This is a known issue with subprocess; there are a few proposals on the tracker about this. See issue1191964 for example. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14872> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14443] Distutils test_bdist_rpm failure
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The attached patch fixed the test for me on Fedora 16. It was necessary for the `define` to be after the -ba switch. I don't know why this wouldn't work on RHEL6 then... -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25650/distutils.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14443> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12304] expose signalfd(2) in the signal module
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Patch seems good (although it doesn't apply cleanly). Why do you not provide a structure to decode the bytes? I thought relying on ctypes in the stdlib was not advised... -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12304> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13031] small speed-up for tarfile.py when unzipping tarballs
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Nice work, thanks! -- assignee: lars.gustaebel -> rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13031> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13031] small speed-up for tarfile.py when unzipping tarballs
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13031> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14584] Add gzip support to xmlrpc.server
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- resolution: -> invalid status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14584> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14626] os module: use keyword-only arguments for dir_fd and nofollow to reduce function count
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14626> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14584] Add gzip support to xmlrpc.server
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The server encodes the response if the length of the response exceeds self.encode_threshold, 1400 (presumably there's no point in compression if the data fits in the MTU anyway). -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14584> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12081] Remove distributed copy of libffi
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: In any case, it should be OK to remove libffi_arm_wince? Is WinCE supported? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12081> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14527] How to link with an external libffi?
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: If it is in a non-standard location, try setting the environment variables: LDFLAGS linker flags, e.g. -L if you have libraries in a nonstandard directory CPPFLAGS(Objective) C/C++ preprocessor flags, e.g. -I if you have headers in a nonstandard directory -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14527> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14467] Avoid exotic documentation in the devguide
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I'm happy to remove the bit about *installing* autoconf altogether. Do you think the Autoconf section (about regenerating configure) should stay where it is or be moved somewhere else? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14467> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14443] Distutils test failure
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The first bad revision is: changeset: 72818:27a36b05caed branch: 3.2 user:Éric Araujo date:Sat Oct 08 00:34:13 2011 +0200 summary: Fix distutils byte-compilation to comply with PEP 3147 (#11254). Cheers -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14443> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14442] test_smtplib.py lacks "import errno"
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > Thanks Ross. I don't think this is worth a news item, even though the > bug was shipped in an alpha. If someone disagrees please add one. I did add it to the [Tests] section in 9c2b710da3c7. Hardly worth it, but ... -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14442> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14443] Distutils test failure
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The output of running rpmbuild from bash: """ $ rpmbuild RPM version 4.9.1.2 Copyright (C) 1998-2002 - Red Hat, Inc. This program may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU GPL Usage: rpmbuild [-v?] [-bp] [-bc] [-bi] [-bl] [-ba] [-bb] [-bs] [-tp] [-tc] [-ti] [-ta] [-tb] [-ts] [--rebuild] [--recompile] [--buildroot=DIRECTORY] [--clean] [--nobuild] [--nodeps] [--nodirtokens] [--rmsource] [--rmspec] [--short-circuit] [--target=CPU-VENDOR-OS] [-D|--define 'MACRO EXPR'] [-E|--eval 'EXPR'] [--macros=] [--nodigest] [--nosignature] [--rcfile=] [-r|--root ROOT] [--dbpath=DIRECTORY] [--querytags] [--showrc] [--quiet] [-v|--verbose] [--version] [-?|--help] [--usage] [--with=] [--without=] [--buildpolicy=] [--sign] """ -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14443> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14443] Distutils test failure
New submission from Ross Lagerwall : On an up to date Fedora 16: == CPython 3.3.0a1+ (default:d528b2d2+, Mar 29 2012, 18:04:26) [GCC 4.6.3 20120306 (Red Hat 4.6.3-2)] == Linux-3.3.0-4.fc16.x86_64-x86_64-with-fedora-16-Verne little-endian == /home/ross/src/cpythondev/temp/build/test_python_21786 Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, no_user_site=0, no_site=0, ignore_environment=0, verbose=0, bytes_warning=0, quiet=0, hash_randomization=1) [1/1] test_distutils test_byte_compile (distutils.tests.test_install_lib.InstallLibTestCase) ... ok test_dont_write_bytecode (distutils.tests.test_install_lib.InstallLibTestCase) ... ok test_finalize_options (distutils.tests.test_install_lib.InstallLibTestCase) ... ok test_get_inputs (distutils.tests.test_install_lib.InstallLibTestCase) ... ok test_get_outputs (distutils.tests.test_install_lib.InstallLibTestCase) ... ok test_no_compiler (distutils.tests.test_msvc9compiler.msvc9compilerTestCase) ... skipped 'These tests are only for win32' test_reg_class (distutils.tests.test_msvc9compiler.msvc9compilerTestCase) ... skipped 'These tests are only for win32' test_remove_entire_manifest (distutils.tests.test_msvc9compiler.msvc9compilerTestCase) ... skipped 'These tests are only for win32' test_remove_visual_c_ref (distutils.tests.test_msvc9compiler.msvc9compilerTestCase) ... skipped 'These tests are only for win32' test_nt_quote_args (distutils.tests.test_spawn.SpawnTestCase) ... ok test_spawn (distutils.tests.test_spawn.SpawnTestCase) ... ok test_announce (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_command_packages_cmdline (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_command_packages_configfile (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_command_packages_unspecified (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_empty_options (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_finalize_options (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_get_command_packages (distutils.tests.test_dist.DistributionTestCase) ... ok test_classifier (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_custom_pydistutils (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_download_url (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_fix_help_options (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_long_description (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_obsoletes (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_obsoletes_illegal (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_provides (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_provides_illegal (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_requires (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_requires_illegal (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_show_help (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_simple_metadata (distutils.tests.test_dist.MetadataTestCase) ... ok test_simple_run (distutils.tests.test_install_headers.InstallHeadersTestCase) ... ok test_finalize_options (distutils.tests.test_upload.uploadTestCase) ... ok test_saved_password (distutils.tests.test_upload.uploadTestCase) ... ok test_server_empty_registration (distutils.tests.test_upload.uploadTestCase) ... ok test_server_registration (distutils.tests.test_upload.uploadTestCase) ... ok test_upload (distutils.tests.test_upload.uploadTestCase) ... ok test_build_ext (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_check_extensions_list (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_compiler_option (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_deployment_target_default (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... skipped 'test only relevant for MacOSX' test_deployment_target_higher_ok (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... skipped 'test only relevant for MacOSX' test_deployment_target_too_low (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... skipped 'test only relevant for MacOSX' test_ext_fullpath (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_finalize_options (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_get_outputs (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_get_source_files (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_optional_extension (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_solaris_enable_shared (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_user_site (distutils.tests.test_build_ext.BuildExtTestCase) ... ok test_build (distutils.tests.test_build_scripts.BuildScriptsTestCase) ... ok test_default_settings (distutils.tests.test_build_scripts.BuildScriptsTestCase) ... ok test_version_int (distutils.
[issue14432] Bug in generator if the generator in created in a C thread
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Here's the patch ;-) -- keywords: +patch nosy: +rosslagerwall Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file25055/generator.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14432> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14359] _posixsubprocess.o compilation error on CentOS 5.8
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Thanks! -- resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14359> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue7997] http://www.python.org/dev/faq/ doesn't seem to explain how to regenerate "configure"
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall nosy: +rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: -> enhancement ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue7997> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14358] test_os failing with errno 61: No Data Available
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Perhaps any errors that occur during supports_extended_attributes should cause it to just return false? -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14358> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8963] test_urllibnet failure
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I tested the code from msg107484 on Fedora 16 with no change in locale. Probably OK to close? -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8963> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14229] On KeyboardInterrupt, the exit code should mirror the signal number
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14229> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14127] os.stat and os.utime: allow preserving exact metadata
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14127> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14079] Problems with recent test_subprocess changes
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Cool, thanks for reporting and debugging the issue :-) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14079> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14079] Problems with recent test_subprocess changes
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: This was hopefully fixed in e5a94b56d6bc. Was it one of the buildbots that was failing? -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14079> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14000] Subprocess stdin.flush does not flush
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: This appears to be a buffering issue with the tr program. Replace with ["cat", "-"] and it works whether the close() is in or not. To fix this, you need to open up the child process so that it is connected to a tty. man 4 pts if you want to investigate this further. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall resolution: -> invalid status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14000> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue14001] Python v2.7.2 / v3.2.2 (SimpleXMLRPCServer): DoS (excessive CPU usage) by processing malformed XMLRPC / HTTP POST request
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue14001> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13981] time.sleep() should use nanosleep() if available
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13981> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13964] os.utimensat() and os.futimes() should accept Decimal, drop os.futimens()
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13964> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10487] http.server doesn't process Status header from CGI scripts
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10487> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10482] subprocess and deadlock avoidance
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue10482> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12157] join method of multiprocessing Pool object hangs if iterable argument of pool.map is empty
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12157> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13937] multiprocessing.ThreadPool.join() blocks indefinitely.
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13937> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13817] deadlock in subprocess while running several threads using Popen
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13817> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13893] Make CGIHTTPServer capable of redirects (and status other than 200)
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13893> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13876] Sporadic failure in test_socket
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13876> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13846] Add time.monotonic() function
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13846> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13845] Use GetSystemTimeAsFileTime() to get a resolution of 100 ns on Windows
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13845> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue8052] subprocess close_fds behavior should only close open fds
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: FreeBSD has a /dev/fd as well as a procfs (deprecated AFAIK). However, both may not be mounted so a patch would *need* to at least fallback to the current functionality. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue8052> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13788] os.closerange optimization
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Thanks for the patch. However, this cannot as far as I understand be used for the subprocess implementation due to the limitation of what can be called after a fork() and before an exec(). Take a look at #8052 for some more discussion of this. -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13788> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13779] os.walk: bottom-up
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13779> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13777] socket: communicating with Mac OS X KEXT controls
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +ned.deily, ronaldoussoren ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13777> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13757] os.fdlistdir() should not close the file descriptor given in argument
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The reason I made it like that was that it seemed "closer" to the fdopendir() function which steals the fd for internal use. However, I agree that it makes more sense to dup() it. Patch looks good. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13757> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13734] Add a generic directory walker method to avoid symlink attacks
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > I'm currently leaning towards the simple 4-tuple approach I would also take that approach. It seems simplest to me. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13734> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13739] os.fdlistdir() is not idempotent
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > I see two options: > 1. rewind the directory stream in fdlistdir() > 2. document this > > Here's a patch for option 1. Yeah, looks good. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13739> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12364] Deadlock in test_concurrent_futures
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Thanks! -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed type: -> behavior ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4489] shutil.rmtree is vulnerable to a symlink attack
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- dependencies: +Add a generic directory walker method to avoid symlink attacks ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue4489> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13734] Add a generic directory walker method to avoid symlink attacks
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: > Has there already been done any work? Ross mentioned he wanted to take a stab? Unfortunately, I'm rather busy at the moment but when I get some free time and if no one else wants to work on it then I'll take a look. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13734> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13713] Regression for http.client read()
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: The patch looks right and seems to fix the issue. Thanks :-) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13713> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13713] Regression for http.client read()
New submission from Ross Lagerwall : 806cfe39f729 introduced a regression for http.client read(len). To see this: $ ./python test.py $ wget http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/1/SRPMS/ $ diff index.html index2.html This is a difference in the files (which there shouldn't be). The change which introduced the problem was: changeset: 73875:806cfe39f729 user:Antoine Pitrou date:Tue Dec 06 22:33:57 2011 +0100 summary: Issue #13464: Add a readinto() method to http.client.HTTPResponse. -- components: Library (Lib) files: test.py messages: 150615 nosy: orsenthil, pitrou, rosslagerwall priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Regression for http.client read() type: behavior versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24138/test.py ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13713> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12364] Deadlock in test_concurrent_futures
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24129/itest.py ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12364] Deadlock in test_concurrent_futures
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Retrieving the result of a future after the executor has been shut down can cause a hang. It seems like this regression was introduced in a76257a99636. This regression exists only for ProcessPoolExecutor. The problem is that even if there are pending work items, the processes are still signaled to shut down leaving the pending work items permanently unfinished. The patch simply removes the call to shut down the processes when there are pending work items. Attached is a patch. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +rosslagerwall Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file24128/issue.patch ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue12364> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13609] Add "os.get_terminal_size()" function
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: I'll try & investigate Solaris a bit... Also, what should be the default terminal size? Gnome-terminal and xterm seem to default to 80x24, not 80x25. -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13609> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13609] Add "os.get_terminal_size()" function
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Nice patch :-) I think the two function approach works well. Since you have already checked that termsize is not NULL, Py_DECREF can be used instead of Py_CLEAR. Would it not be better to use sys.__stdout__ instead of 1 in the documentation and to use STDOUT_FILENO instead of 1 in the code? A brief google suggested that Solaris requires sys/termios.h for TIOCGWINSZ. Perhaps also only define TERMSIZE_USE_IOCTL if TIOCGWINSZ is defined. Like so: #if defined(HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H) #include #if defined(TIOCGWINSZ) #define TERMSIZE_USE_IOCTL #else #define TERMSIZE_USE_NOTIMPLEMENTED #endif #elif defined(HAVE_CONIO_H) #include #include #define TERMSIZE_USE_CONIO #else #define TERMSIZE_USE_NOTIMPLEMENTED #endif (didn't check the windows parts) -- ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13609> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13694] asynchronous connect in asyncore.dispatcher does not set addr
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13694> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13684] httplib tunnel infinite loop
Changes by Ross Lagerwall : -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue13684> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11006] warnings with subprocess and pipe2
Ross Lagerwall added the comment: Removed the warnings. Thanks. -- assignee: -> rosslagerwall nosy: +rosslagerwall resolution: -> fixed stage: -> committed/rejected status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker <http://bugs.python.org/issue11006> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
