TJ added the comment:
Thanks for the pointer to #5288. Happy to consolidate there.
In my reading of #5094 (from which I pulled your RFC 2822 reference), the
justification I found was "For the allowable range, follow the datetime docs as
someone might be relying on that specification al
New submission from TJ:
The datetime module only supports timezone offsets within 24 hours of UTC:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#datetime.tzinfo.utcoffset
This seems like an arbitrary restriction, and prevents the library from being
used in arbitrary timezone translations
TJ added the comment:
For future visitors, here is the MacPorts issue:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/45247
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22
TJ added the comment:
I should have mentioned that this a Macports environment. So python, bsddb all
come from there. Looks like that might be the culprit.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22
TJ added the comment:
No issue with 3.4 on the Mac box.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22534>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsub
TJ added the comment:
Thanks for the help. For my linux box, I have no issue. This is Ubuntu 13.10:
Linux localhost 3.11.0-26-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jul 15 04:02:06 UTC
2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
2.7.5+ (default, Feb 27 2014, 19:37:08)
[GCC 4.8.1]
However, I'm
TJ added the comment:
Put it in the while loop. Same result. Memory usage grows about 1 GiB per
minute.
--
___
Python tracker
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22
New submission from TJ:
The following code causes memory usage to grow excessively.
'''
import shelve
def func():
for i in range(100):
sh = shelve.open('blah')
sh.close()
func()
'''
--
components: Library (Lib)
message
TJ Sullivan added the comment:
Install was successful. PLease find the attachment with the test results you
asked for. Thank you very much for making the fix to the package installer
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file16035/install test results.txt
TJ Sullivan added the comment:
I would be happy to test the new package for you. I am running 10.3.9 and Had
attempted to install 2.6.4 recently without realizing it, so my terminal
version is 2.6.4 but idle and back at 2.5. email me if you want me to test it
for you.
--
nosy
TJ Usiyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
same here
--
nosy: +TJ
___
Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4017>
___
__
11 matches
Mail list logo