[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: -- assignee: ncoghlan - ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Brett Cannon added the comment: I got overruled on the deprecation idea due to utility code like walk_packages that pkgutil contains. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Mark Lawrence added the comment: Hardly a good start :-( From the IDLE shell. Python 3.4.1 (v3.4.1:c0e311e010fc, May 18 2014, 10:38:22) [MSC v.1600 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type copyright, credits or license() for more information. from pkgutil import walk_packages packages =

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Mark Lawrence added the comment: Has anyone made any progress with this issue or others referenced like #7559 or #14787 ? Regardless I'd like to help out directly if possible as I'm suffering from an acute case of triagitis :-) -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan added the comment: Dropped down my priority list (it's a nice to have to make the code base a bit easier to work on, rather than something essential). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Eric Snow ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - ncoghlan ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment: I'd like to work on this if that's okay. I've already written test cases for issue 7559 and issue 15299 that required creating temporary packages, so I understand the need. And I'd also like to create test cases for issue 14787,

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com: -- dependencies: +Refactor the create-package code in test_runpy into a helper module ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment: That sounds good, and thanks for working on this - if we can get the tests cleaned up for the 3.3 release, that will make ongoing maintenance a lot easier. -- ___ Python tracker

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment: The walk_packages tests should also be enhanced to ensure correctly handling of namespace packages -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment: Note that the problem described in #14787 will limit the scope of what can be tested. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

New submission from Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: Created to record the egregious hack of relying on the test_runpy infrastructure in order to test pkgutil.walk_packages. It gets the job done, but is a really messy way of going about it. Worth cleaning up by factoring the support code out

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: -- dependencies: +pydoc -w package writes out page with empty Package Contents section ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com added the comment: Also, a second test case should be added to cover the zipimporter.zipimporter component. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: -- priority: low - normal ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Changes by Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +cjerdonek ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15358 ___ ___

[issue15358] Test pkgutil.walk_packages in test_pkgutil instead of test_runpy

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment: Such helper functionality could also be used in the tests of unittest.TestLoader.loadTestsFromName(). See, for example, the tests proposed for issue 7559. -- ___ Python tracker