[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Changes by Tumer Topcu tum...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +tumert, zach.ware ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Changes by Tumer Topcu tum...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +trent ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Tumer Topcu added the comment: Another option is instead of adding a timeout parameter, a new function to check if everything is done. Like: def all_tasks_finished(self) return self._unfinished_tasks._semlock._is_zero() Which can then be utilized exactly shown in the above noted stackoverflow answer. This way it will be consistent with queue.py -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Richard Oudkerk added the comment: I notice that queue.Queue.join() does not have a timeout parameter either. Have you hit a particular problem that would be substantially easier with the patch? -- versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Karl Bicker added the comment: Actually, I would like to check if the threads working on the queue are still alive. However, it occurs to me now that I would need a facility to distinguish between a timeout and an actual join. Unfortunately, my original patch does not provide this, one would have to implement an additional check and think about the correct way to signal a timeout. Also, there seem to be other people looking for this feature: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1564501/add-timeout-argument-to-pythons-queue-join -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
New submission from Karl Bicker: The multiprocessing.JoinableQueue's function join() should have a timeout argument so that one can check on other things while waiting for a queue to finish. As join() uses a condition to wait anyway, a timeout is easily implemented and passed to the Condidition.wait(). Patch is attached. -- components: Library (Lib) files: JoinableQueue_with_timeout.patch keywords: patch messages: 170812 nosy: legordian priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27233/JoinableQueue_with_timeout.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com: -- versions: -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15983] multiprocessing JoinableQueue's join function with timeout
Changes by Richard Oudkerk shibt...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +sbt ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15983 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com