[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2014-07-22 Thread Charles-François Natali

Charles-François Natali added the comment:

Jerrfey, thanks for your patch, but apparently in the - long - meantime, the 
declaration has already been moved up.

--
nosy: +neologix
resolution:  - out of date
stage:  - resolved
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2014-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Armstrong

Jeffrey Armstrong added the comment:

Next time I see a bug I'll be sure to wait rather than actually submit a 
patch...

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2014-07-22 Thread Charles-François Natali

Charles-François Natali added the comment:

 Jeffrey Armstrong added the comment:

 Next time I see a bug I'll be sure to wait rather than actually submit a 
 patch...

I understand your frustration, but please don't do that: you have to
understand that we don't have any automatic reminder of issues, so it
can happen that some go unnoticed, especially if no core developer is
assigned.
Is this happens in the future, simply send an email on the python-dev
mailing list saying that you've got a patch waiting for review, this
shoud do the trick.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2014-07-16 Thread Mark Lawrence

Mark Lawrence added the comment:

Can we have a review of the one line patch please.

--
nosy: +BreamoreBoy
versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2013-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Armstrong

New submission from Jeffrey Armstrong:

When compiling Modules/_cursesmodule.c as a static module with GCC 2.95.3, an 
error is encountered on line 2260 in PyCurses_GetWin.  The error occurs because 
the PyCursesInitialised macro appears prior _Py_IDENTIFIER(read), which is 
actually a variable declaration.  Switching the order of the statements fixes 
the issue.

In all other functions within Modules/_cursesmodule.c, PyCursesInitialised 
always appears after all variable declarations.

This bug was encountered on the platform m68k-atari-mint using Python 3.3.0 and 
GCC 2.95.3.

--
components: Build
files: curses.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 183877
nosy: Jeffrey.Armstrong
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)
type: compile error
versions: Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file29365/curses.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17391] _cursesmodule Fails to Build on GCC 2.95 (static)

2013-03-10 Thread Jeffrey Armstrong

Changes by Jeffrey Armstrong jeffrey.armstr...@approximatrix.com:


--
components: +Extension Modules -Build

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17391
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com