[issue19277] zlib compressobj: missing parameter doc strings
New submission from Tobias Oberstein: Currently the `zlib` module documents zlib.compressobj([level]) However, there are more parameters present already today: zlib.compressobj([level, method, wbits]) These other parameters are used in at least 2 deployed libraries (in the context of WebSocket compression): https://github.com/tavendo/AutobahnPython/blob/master/autobahn/autobahn/compress_deflate.py#L527 http://code.google.com/p/pywebsocket/source/browse/trunk/src/mod_pywebsocket/util.py#231 -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation, Library (Lib) messages: 200113 nosy: docs@python, oberstet priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: zlib compressobj: missing parameter doc strings type: enhancement versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19277 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19277] zlib compressobj: missing parameter doc strings
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c54c8e71b79a by Georg Brandl in branch '2.7': Closes #19277: document all parameters of compressobj(). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c54c8e71b79a -- nosy: +python-dev resolution: - fixed stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19277 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19277] zlib compressobj: missing parameter doc strings
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg200151 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19277 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19277] zlib compressobj: missing parameter doc strings
R. David Murray added the comment: Hmm. Looks like the name of the temp files used by the failing test (which is in bsddb, by the way) have changed, so my delete command didn't delete them. So now /tmp is definitely clean, and the next build on that bot should work (crosses fingers). -- nosy: +r.david.murray ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19277 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com