[issue22492] small addition to print() docs: no binary streams.
Georg Brandl added the comment: Looks good. sys.stdout, when rebound to a binary mode file Not sure that is supported in any way :) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22492] small addition to print() docs: no binary streams.
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 9b519f72860a by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.4': Issue 22492: Be explicit that print does not support binary mode files. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9b519f72860a -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22492] small addition to print() docs: no binary streams.
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- assignee: - terry.reedy resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22492] small addition to print() docs: no binary streams.
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Agreed. Here is a patch I will commit if you approve. I deleted 'convenience function' as distracting, labelled *file* a *text* stream in the first line, and added the rest of the comment after the current 'file' sentence, making separate 'file' and 'flush' paragraphs. I unstarred 'file' in the addition to try to make it slightly clearer that the comment applies to the default sys.stdout, when rebound to a binary mode file, as well as to explicit *file=* arguments. -- nosy: +terry.reedy stage: - commit review type: - enhancement versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36765/print-22492-34.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue22492] small addition to print() docs: no binary streams.
New submission from Georg Brandl: This is implicit in the converts arguments to strings, but people might reasonably expect that print(x, file=y) is the same as y.write(x) for strings and bytes. This paragraph makes it clear. -- files: print_binary.diff keywords: patch messages: 227509 nosy: georg.brandl priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: small addition to print() docs: no binary streams. Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36719/print_binary.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22492 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
