Martin Panter added the comment:
I committed my patch for Issue 24278 (revision ad7da726bea6), so this notice is
now removed
--
nosy: +martin.panter
resolution: -> fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed
superseder: -> Docs on Parsing arguments should say
Berker Peksag added the comment:
The patch looks good to me. Note that the patch in issue 24278 also removes the
same note.
--
nosy: +berker.peksag
stage: -> patch review
type: -> behavior
versions: +Python 3.5, Python 3.6 -Python 3.4
___
Python
Petr Viktorin added the comment:
The note is *correct* concerning the length, but I don't think it's relevant:
in a NUL-terminated string without embedded NULs, the length is unambiguous.
The other issues are about u itself, not the note. (I have nothing against
the it is recommended to use
R. David Murray added the comment:
The note is still valid concerning the length. (Perhaps Victor should have
deprected u instead of fixing it.)
--
nosy: +haypo, r.david.murray
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
About wording see also issue23088.
About possible deprecating see issue24009.
--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue24082
New submission from Petr Viktorin:
A note in the docs for the u format unit saus NULs are not allowed, but the
previous sentence says they aren't accepted.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
files: 0002-Remove-obsolete-note-in-argument-parsing-docs.patch
keywords: patch
