[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2017-06-20 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: In msg149930, Roger said "There are two major changes that are not covered by other issues (AFAIK). 1) The "PseudoStderrFile" in PyShell.py brings the shell forward if an error occurs. I like this behavior. 2) Run a script without saving it first. This

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2017-06-19 Thread Vedran Čačić
Vedran Čačić added the comment: I'd just like to say that I like A configuration preference that permits writing and running test programs from the editor without having to save the file (you're warned upon quitting whether to save). very much, it would save me a lot of time, and

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2017-06-19 Thread Ned Deily
Ned Deily added the comment: House cleaning: much time has passed since this issue was originally opened and the state of IDLE development has changed dramatically for the better since then, thanks, in large part, to Terry taking charge. I suspect that nearly all of the individual items here

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2014-02-04 Thread Tal Einat
Changes by Tal Einat talei...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -taleinat ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2013-04-28 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: With PEP343 accepted, we can apply changes more uniformly. I think each of the changes listed should be separate issues with separate review, as most already are (msg149930). Run a script without saving it first. I am sure this has been mentioned on at

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2013-03-25 Thread Todd Rovito
Changes by Todd Rovito rovit...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Todd.Rovito ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2012-03-27 Thread Andrew Svetlov
Changes by Andrew Svetlov andrew.svet...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +asvetlov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-12-21 Thread Roger Serwy
Roger Serwy roger.se...@gmail.com added the comment: The large patch also contains the same patch in issue6649. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-12-20 Thread Roger Serwy
Roger Serwy roger.se...@gmail.com added the comment: I went through the changes in idlelib20101012_From_r32a3.patch. A lot of the changes are for using relative imports. Those changes aside, here is a list of issues that this patch covers. Most of these issues already have patches that are

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-12-20 Thread Roger Serwy
Roger Serwy roger.se...@gmail.com added the comment: minor mistake - issue3559 Pasted \n not same as typed \n -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-12-20 Thread Ned Deily
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment: Thanks, Roger. It would also be helpful if you ascertain for the overlaps which of the two versions is newer, the individual issue/path or the large feature diff. The relative import changes should not be applied in the standard library; they were

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-12-20 Thread Roger Serwy
Roger Serwy roger.se...@gmail.com added the comment: I checked the submitted patches from the issues against the large patch by eye. Guilherme's patches in these separate issues have the same contents: issue1207589, issue1612262, issue1721083, issue6699, issue3359. The large patch updates

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-01-03 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: Ping. IDLE dead again? -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-01-03 Thread Ned Deily
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment: Not dead, just pining for the fjords. The two versions of the patch as submitted need some work before being ready for review. One issue is that the patches were originally applied to earlier snapshots of IDLE, so some subsequent changes have been

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2011-01-03 Thread Bruce Sherwood
Bruce Sherwood bruce.sherw...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks for the reassurance, Ned. I would be happy to help, but frankly I don't know my way around in IDLE very well, and I pretty much tried simply to get Polo's changes into the hopper. Presumably if you want a view of the separate

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-18 Thread Bruce Sherwood
Bruce Sherwood bruce.sherw...@gmail.com added the comment: At Guido's request, I've carried out the same update to the IDLE distributed with Python 2.7 that I submitted for Python 3, to incorporate the work of Guilherme Polo in the Google Summer of Code 2009. Guido was concerned that with

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-17 Thread Bruce Sherwood
Bruce Sherwood bruce.sherw...@gmail.com added the comment: I found a couple of mistakes in the patch I submitted (places where vidle should have been idlelib, and which aren't addressed in Ned Deily's patch), so I've rebuilt the patch starting from the tag r32a3, which I assume is the version

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-15 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +kbk ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-14 Thread Bruce Sherwood
Bruce Sherwood bruce.sherw...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks for catching the missing utils.py file. I can explain the missing/commented statement in IOBinding.py. I found experimentally that if that statement is present, when you open a file on Windows the first line is off the top of

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-14 Thread Brian Curtin
Changes by Brian Curtin cur...@acm.org: -- nosy: +taleinat ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-14 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10079 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-13 Thread Ned Deily
Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment: Thanks for creating the patch. Since it is a feature, it would be considered to be applied to the current py3k branch (which at the moment is what will be going into the 3.2 release) rather than 3.1 which is generally only accepting bug fixes. By

[issue10079] idlelib for Python 3 with Guilherme Polo GSoC enhancements

2010-10-12 Thread Bruce Sherwood
New submission from Bruce Sherwood bruce.sherw...@gmail.com: It is proposed to incorporate the work of Guilherme Polo in the 2009 Google Summer of Code into idlelib. Polo's enhancements have been extensively tested for a year through being included with VPython. Here is a description from