Martin Panter added the comment:
Issue 13893 was closed as a duplicate of this issue. There are patches and
modified code there that may be worth looking at though.
--
nosy: +martin.panter
superseder: Make CGIHTTPServer capable of redirects (and status other than 200)
->
Changes by Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com:
--
assignee: - orsenthil
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10487
___
___
Changes by Senthil Kumaran sent...@uthcode.com:
--
superseder: - Make CGIHTTPServer capable of redirects (and status other than
200)
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10487
___
Changes by Ross Lagerwall rosslagerw...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +rosslagerwall
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10487
___
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
title: http.server - doesn't process Status: header from CGI scripts -
http.server doesn't process Status header from CGI scripts
versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com added the comment:
Just to mention, with the added code from issue 10482, I was able to get a
3-stream functionality working great in http.server and also backported it to
2.6 CGIHTTPServer... and to properly process the Status: header on stdout.
Works
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +facundobatista, fdrake, orsenthil
type: behavior - feature request
versions: -Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10487
New submission from Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com:
While it is documented that http.server (and Python 2's CGIHTTPServer) do not
process the status header, and limit the usefulness of CGI scripts as a result,
that doesn't make it less of a bug, just a documented bug. But I guess that
