[issue11310] Document byte[s|array]() and byte[s|array](count) in docstrings

2012-03-30 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Duplicate of issue 11231. -- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: - duplicate stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed superseder: - bytes() constructor is not correctly documented ___

[issue11310] Document byte[s|array]() and byte[s|array](count) in docstrings

2012-03-25 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment: I think you could just go ahead and commit your patch. I don’t remember if the reST docs were changed recently-ish or if it’s still an open bug, so you may want to check that the new docstrings matches the doc. -- nosy: +eric.araujo

[issue11310] Document byte[s|array]() and byte[s|array](count) in docstrings

2011-02-24 Thread Terry J. Reedy
New submission from Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: The entry for bytearray(source...) says The optional source parameter can be used to initialize the array in a few different ways: ... If it is an integer, the array will have that size and will be initialized with null bytes. ... Without