anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Still not documented..
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
___
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Another 4 complains about missing references:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1015307/python-bind-an-unbound-method
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Mike Hoy mho...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mikehoy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Guandalino guandal...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +guandalino
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
keywords: +easy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
nosy: +eric.araujo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
___
Python-bugs-list
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Nevermind about #6040 - I just used the same technique to provide a workaround
and then remembered I've seen this recipe on StackOverflow.
To me types is the right place, because that's exactly where are you sent from
the docs of new
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment:
When we do document types, their constructors and methods should also be
documented. This is a valid request.
--
nosy: +georg.brandl
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
All the types in the types module are, being types, potentially callable to
produce instances of that type. But they are in types rather than builtins
precisely because it is not expected that they be called directly. They are
bound to names
anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com added the comment:
Message is classified as spam. I am not sure if you see it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Messages that only consist of links are classified that way. To refer to other
issues, use #x, as with #6040, but I have no idea which of the many
messages you were referring to, so use msgxx.
The stack overflow link
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg133353
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
For anyone curious, I removed the falsely classified as spam message after
copying the links into my previous message.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
New submission from anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
types.MethodType(function, instance) is used as a replacement for
new.instancemethod(function, instance, class), but this usage is not documented.
--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
messages: 133089
nosy:
Changes by Brian Curtin br...@python.org:
--
stage: - needs patch
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11776
___
___
15 matches
Mail list logo