[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-31 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: I've submitted the 'harmless' patch (and much, much more) in r58741. I'm closing this now, the rest probably has been implemented one way or another as well. If you see something I missed, please open a new issue with a patch for just that issue. -- r

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-28 Thread Gregory P. Smith
Changes by Gregory P. Smith: -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http:/

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-26 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: Here is the patch that contains only the harmless parts of the previous patches. It changes a bunch of doc strings, changes the name of the types and their repr() and str(). It also adds __builtin__.buffer but it leaves __builtin__.bytes, __builtin__.str8 and b

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-26 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Setting to 'high' everything related to PEP 3137. -- priority: -> high __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ __

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-09 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: I don't think I can check these in yet; right now they are inconsistent. But I will check them in when they are ready. -- assignee: -> gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-09 Thread Christian Heimes
Christian Heimes added the comment: Guido van Rossum wrote: > Guido van Rossum added the comment: > > GHave you two agreed yet as to which patch(es) I should look at? Please commit Alexandres patch. His patch for bytesobject.c is based on my patch. It's more complete and a bit better than mine,

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-09 Thread Guido van Rossum
Guido van Rossum added the comment: GHave you two agreed yet as to which patch(es) I should look at? -- nosy: +gvanrossum __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-08 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti: __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/option

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-08 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Changes by Alexandre Vassalotti: __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/option

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-08 Thread Alexandre Vassalotti
Alexandre Vassalotti added the comment: I am not sure how the parser work, so I can't comment if your change to it is correct. It would probably a better idea to keep it for later, when the semantic differences between str8 and bytes objects will be resolved. I think changing b'' to buffer(b''),

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-08 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Changes by Martin v. Löwis: -- keywords: +patch __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.p

[issue1247] PEP 3137 patch (repr, names, parser)

2007-10-08 Thread Christian Heimes
New submission from Christian Heimes : The patches changes: - change PyString's repr() to return "b'...'" - change PyBytes's repr() to return "buffer(b'...')" - change parser so that b"..." returns PyString, not PyBytes - r