[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Łukasz Langa added the comment: Thanks, Serhiy! ✨  ✨ -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Łukasz Langa added the comment: New changeset d55a03e02e69fb7f639998de71ed3f44c2f4f999 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': [3.10] bpo-13236: Flush the output stream more often in unittest (GH-29929) (GH-30039)

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Łukasz Langa added the comment: New changeset 83fa1291fd0a25216a4a9e990f423682fda67cbe by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.10': [3.10] bpo-13236: Flush the output stream more often in unittest (GH-29864) (GH-29929)

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 9.0 -> 10.0 pull_requests: +28265 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30039 ___ Python tracker

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- pull_requests: +28153 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29929 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset f42a06ba279c916fb67289e47f9bc60dc5dee4ee by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'main': bpo-13236: Flush the output stream more often in unittest (GH-29864) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/f42a06ba279c916fb67289e47f9bc60dc5dee4ee --

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I do not remember details, but I encountered this issue (maybe when run tests in subprocesses?). -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.9 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Change by Serhiy Storchaka : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +serhiy.storchaka nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0 pull_requests: +28091 stage: test needed -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/29864 ___ Python tracker

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Irit Katriel added the comment: Reproduced on 3.11. -- nosy: +iritkatriel versions: +Python 3.11 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +rbcollins ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13236 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Stéphane Wirtel added the comment: ping about this bug, do you have the same problem with the last version of Python 3.4 and with Python 2.7.8 ? -- nosy: +matrixise ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13236

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Antoine Pitrou added the comment: And if the issue still holds, please provide a patch adding the appropriate flush() calls. -- nosy: +pitrou ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13236

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net added the comment: Attached is a test file. The key here is that I'm running the unittest suite inside of a long-running server process, so there is no predictable point of exit and cleanup. Therefore, the steps I show at the end of the file should be run in

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

New submission from Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net: I'm using the TextTestRunner class in unittest/runner.py with a special file-like object passed in as stream. Doing this loses some output, because the run() method (and some lower-level methods) don't always call flush() on the stream.

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: How can a lack of flushes lose output? Delay it maybe, but unless your file class is broken I don't see how data would be lost. -- nosy: +r.david.murray versions: -Python 2.6 ___ Python

[issue13236] unittest needs more flush calls

Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment: Can you provide a minimal test case to reproduce the issue? -- nosy: +ezio.melotti stage: - test needed versions: -Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org