[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2022-03-22 Thread Irit Katriel
Irit Katriel added the comment: The patch needs to be reviewed. If the tests are still relevant and increase coverage, it needs to be converted to a GitHub PR. Otherwise this issue can be closed. -- keywords: +easy, newcomer friendly -patch nosy: +iritkatriel

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2019-03-16 Thread andrea crotti
andrea crotti added the comment: It has been a long time but if it's still useful sure. I can see some tests have been added in commit 863b1e4d0e95036bca4e97c1b8b2ca72c19790fb but if these are still relevant I'm happy to go ahead. -- ___ Python

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2019-03-15 Thread Mark Lawrence
Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2014-06-28 Thread Mark Lawrence
Mark Lawrence added the comment: @Andrea assuming that you get an answer to the question you posed in msg150292, will you follow up on this? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2011-12-28 Thread andrea crotti
New submission from andrea crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com: This patch increases test coverage for pstats.py from 25 to 36%. It's my first proposed patch so sorry in advance if there are problems. Much more can be done for pstats.py (which is also not much commented) but I want to get some

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2011-12-28 Thread Brian Curtin
Changes by Brian Curtin br...@python.org: -- nosy: +brian.curtin stage: - patch review ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13670 ___

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2011-12-28 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: I don't understand this comment: +#TODO: add more complicated tests, which might almost compile Also, please don't use docstrings for the test methods because of unittest's feature to display them instead of the test method names.

[issue13670] Increase test coverage for pstats.py

2011-12-28 Thread andrea crotti
andrea crotti andrea.crott...@gmail.com added the comment: It's really hard to understand true, and if should not go in the patch in general of course. The sense was that the only test I added is trivial, but I haven't produced something better yet. And ok I will remove the docstrings, I was