[issue1396825] subprocess: wait for a period of time
Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment: This is now being addressed in issue 5673, so closing this as a duplicate. astrand, please let me know if I'm wrong about this. -- nosy: +skrah resolution: - duplicate stage: - committed/rejected status: open - closed superseder: - Add timeout option to subprocess.Popen ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1396825 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1396825] subprocess: wait for a period of time
gd2shoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: This is just common sense. I'm trying to avoid a poll() busy-wait section of code. I'll figure it out, but it would be much, much easier if wait accepted a number of seconds, and returned None if the process was still going (cf. Popen.poll() ). I'm much happier with subprocess than os.popen*. I'm also glad that Popen.kill() is slated for 3.0 . Since this isn't in the 3.0b3 documentation, I assume this either isn't fixed or planned? Are there implementation difficulties? -- nosy: +gd2shoe ___ Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1396825 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1396825] subprocess: wait for a period of time
Changes by Christian Heimes: _ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1396825 _ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
