[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

Zachary Ware added the comment: As Python 2.7 has reached end-of-life and the bsddb module is not shipped with Python 3, I'm closing the issue. -- nosy: +zach.ware resolution: -> out of date stage: needs patch -> resolved status: open -> closed

[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

Change by Mark Lawrence : -- nosy: -BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

Mark Lawrence added the comment: I think msg160322 and msg160339 are saying this isn't an issue. If I'm correct it can be closed. If I'm wrong who is best placed to provide the needed patch? -- nosy: +BreamoreBoy ___ Python tracker

[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Given the way Oracle is currently behaving, I personally think he is wise to delete it. It's optional at build-time anyway. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: Ah, I see. No, the docs are correct, I'm the one who was mistaken. I thought the license page was on www.python.org, rather than docs.python.org. Developers *do* have full and easy access to docs.python.org, and we do track doc bugs

[issue14759] BSDDB license missing from liscense page in 2.7.

Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es added the comment: If your program is not using Berkeley DB in any way, you don't need to worry about its license. The situation is similar to Berkeley DB being included in you linux distribution: if you don't use it, you don't have to worry. --