[issue14793] broken grammar in Built-in Types doc

2012-05-14 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com added the comment: I thought the title was enough? Is it fine to merely repeat it in? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue14793 ___

[issue14793] broken grammar in Built-in Types doc

2012-05-14 Thread Sandro Tosi
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment: I think that something on the line Hey, it looks like this phrase misses some words, and I've just fixed it would have been nicer - IMO. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org

[issue14793] broken grammar in Built-in Types doc

2012-05-13 Thread Roundup Robot
New submission from Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za: New changeset e0dcd732055f by Sandro Tosi in branch '3.2': Issue #14793: fix grammar in bytes object paragraph; patch by Tshepang Lekhonkhobe http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e0dcd732055f -- nosy: +python-dev

[issue14793] broken grammar in Built-in Types doc

2012-05-13 Thread Sandro Tosi
Sandro Tosi sandro.t...@gmail.com added the comment: Committed, thanks for the patch. For next times, please invest even a small amount of time describing why you opened the issue and what the patch fixes: it's definitely nicer not having to infer it from the diff. -- nosy:

[issue14793] broken grammar in Built-in Types doc

2012-05-12 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Changes by Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: grammar.diff keywords: patch nosy: docs@python, tshepang priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: broken grammar in Built-in Types doc versions: Python 3.2, Python