[issue1540386] SocketServer.ForkingMixIn.collect_children() waits on pid 0

2010-08-03 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:


--
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1540386
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1540386] SocketServer.ForkingMixIn.collect_children() waits on pid 0

2009-04-23 Thread Stefan Ring

Stefan Ring stefan...@gmail.com added the comment:

Jeffrey, this very commit broke it. See also issue 5814. The same
happened for me last week. What makes it especially bad is that even
once enough children terminate, the SocketServer won't be able to handle
any more connections; it just throws this Exception again and again and
closes new connections immediately.

--
nosy: +Ringding

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1540386
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1540386] SocketServer.ForkingMixIn.collect_children() waits on pid 0

2009-04-23 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin

Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com added the comment:

Yes, sorry. That was fixed in r69927.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1540386
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1540386] SocketServer.ForkingMixIn.collect_children() waits on pid 0

2008-03-14 Thread Ralf Schmitt

Changes by Ralf Schmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


--
nosy: +schmir

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1540386
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue1540386] SocketServer.ForkingMixIn.collect_children() waits on pid 0

2008-02-28 Thread Jeffrey Yasskin

Jeffrey Yasskin added the comment:

Mostly fixed in r61106. This should make the buildbots happy, but there
is still a corner case in which we waitpid(0) and could confuse other
libraries.

--
nosy: +jyasskin
type:  - behavior
versions: +Python 2.6

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1540386
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com