[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2020-10-22 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: setuptools is recommended over distutils, and doesn’t have the issue (per previous messages). -- assignee: eric.araujo -> resolution: -> wont fix stage: needs patch -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2014-03-13 Thread Éric Araujo
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org: -- components: +Distutils -Distutils2 stage: - needs patch title: distutils2: build should use a version-specific build directory - distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory versions: +Python 3.5 -3rd party, Python 3.4

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-17 Thread Ronald Oussoren
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I don't think this is a bugfix, but a new feature and as such the behavior should only be changed for 3.4. The easiest workaround for this issue is to use setuptools or distribute when installing, as those tools do set the various build directories to

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-15 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis added the comment: Changing of name of subdirectory would break e.g. shell scripts, which set PYTHONPATH=build/lib when calling Python scripts, so this change rather should not be made in micro releases. -- ___

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-14 Thread Ronald Oussoren
Ronald Oussoren added the comment: I'd change the name of the subdirectories of build instead of the name of the build directory itself. That way distutils will still create one build directory regardless of how many python versions you use, and the name of that directory is easily

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-14 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: I'd change the name of the subdirectories of build instead of the name of the build directory itself. Yep that’s what I was thinking about (or if I wasn’t, I should have been :) IIRC distutils is more or less closed for development w.r.t. new features. Not

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-10 Thread Éric Araujo
Éric Araujo added the comment: It seems to me this is just a special case of the more general issue of building multiple versions of the same distribution, say with multiple versions of Python 2. In general, anytime you change your build environment, you should start with no existing

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-10 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfrever@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Arfrever ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15419 ___

[issue15419] distutils: build should use a version-specific build directory

2012-09-10 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis added the comment: Currently users can run e.g.: $ python2.7 setup.py build -b build-2.7 install $ python3.2 setup.py build -b build-3.2 install If default name of build directory had to be changed, then it would be useful to also include name of Python