[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-29 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset bfa5d0ddfbeb by Trent Nelson in branch '2.7':
Issue #15765: Fix quirky NetBSD getcwd() behaviour.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/bfa5d0ddfbeb

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-29 Thread Trent Nelson

Changes by Trent Nelson tr...@snakebite.org:


--
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-25 Thread Stefan Krah

Stefan Krah added the comment:

I completely forgot about that issue. The patch looks good to me.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-24 Thread Charles-François Natali

Charles-François Natali added the comment:

This doesn't look thread-related:

load: 0.50  cmd: python 10630 [runnable] 0.27u 13.07s 46% 10976k
load: 0.87  cmd: python 10630 [runnable] 0.27u 94.24s 98% 10976k


See the huge system time?
This probably means that the kernel is struggling with path name
resolution, although that's surprising because 4099 is a reasonable
limit.
Do you have something like strace or truss on NetBSD?
The first thing to try could be to lower the limit, and see what
happens, but it's really likely a FS scalibility limit you're hitting
(altough, once again, that's really surprising given the reasonable
limit). Are you running those under VMs?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-24 Thread Trent Nelson

Trent Nelson added the comment:

Hacked the test to print out info each loop:


test_getcwd_long_pathnames (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... [0/0] 
getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[1/57] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[2/114] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[3/171] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[4/228] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[5/285] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[6/342] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[7/399] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[8/456] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[9/513] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[10/570] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[11/627] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[12/684] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[13/741] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[14/798] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[15/855] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[16/912] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[17/969] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[18/1026] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[19/1083] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[20/1140] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[21/1197] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[22/1254] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[23/1311] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[24/1368] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[25/1425] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[26/1482] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[27/1539] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[28/1596] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[29/1653] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[30/1710] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[31/1767] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[32/1824] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[33/1881] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[34/1938] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[35/1995] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[36/2052] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[37/2109] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[38/2166] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[39/2223] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[40/2280] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[41/2337] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[42/2394] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[43/2451] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[44/2508] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[45/2565] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[46/2622] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[47/2679] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[48/2736] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[49/2793] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[50/2850] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[51/2907] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[52/2964] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[53/3021] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[54/3078] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[55/3135] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[56/3192] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[57/3249] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[58/3306] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[59/3363] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[60/3420] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[61/3477] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[62/3534] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[63/3591] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[64/3648] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[65/3705] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[66/3762] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[67/3819] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[68/3876] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[69/3933] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
[70/3990] getcwd-test-directory-0123456789abcdef-01234567890abcdef
^C^C
load: 1.08  cmd: python 4486 [runnable] 0.07u 14.38s 40% 10012k
load: 1.08  cmd: python 4486 [runnable] 0.07u 14.91s 40% 

[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-24 Thread Trent Nelson

Trent Nelson added the comment:

Looks like this is a duplicate of issue 9185.  The fix used for that just needs 
to be extended to cover NetBSD as well.  See proposed patch.  I'll commit this 
to 2.7 in a day or two if there are no objections.

Antoine: added you as nosy as you were involved with the original patch.

--
keywords: +patch
resolution:  - duplicate
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file26987/getcwd_netbsd.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-23 Thread STINNER Victor

Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +haypo, neologix

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-22 Thread Trent Nelson

New submission from Trent Nelson:

The 2.7 builds of both my NetBSD slaves keep hanging on test_posix (and 
eventually time out after an hour).  Running the test manually:


netbsd51-x86-1$ pwd   
/home/cpython/2.7
netbsd51-x86-1$ b/test/regrtest.py -uall -rwW -v test_posix   
== CPython 2.7.3+ (2.7:c1c45755397b, Aug 22 2012, 14:05:02) [GCC 4.1.3 20080704 
prerelease (NetBSD nb2 20081120)]
==   NetBSD-5.1.2-i386-32bit-ELF little-endian
==   /home/cpython/2.7/build/test_python_10630
Testing with flags: sys.flags(debug=0, py3k_warning=1, division_warning=1, 
division_new=0, inspect=0, interactive=0, optimize=0, dont_write_bytecode=0, 
no_user_site=0, no_site=0, ignore_environment=1, tabcheck=2, verbose=0, 
unicode=0, bytes_warning=0, hash_randomization=1)
Using random seed 2040018
test_posix
testNoArgFunctions (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_access (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_chdir (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_chflags (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_chown (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_confstr (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_dup (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_dup2 (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_fchown (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_fdopen (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_fstat (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_fstatvfs (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_ftruncate (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... ok
test_getcwd_long_pathnames (test.test_posix.PosixTester) ... load: 0.50  cmd: 
python 10630 [runnable] 0.27u 13.07s 46% 10976k
load: 0.87  cmd: python 10630 [runnable] 0.27u 94.24s 98% 10976k
^C^C

Placeholder issue at the moment.

although this looks pretty dodgy:


os.chdir(dirname)
try:
os.getcwd()
if current_path_length  4099:
_create_and_do_getcwd(dirname, current_path_length 
+ len(dirname) + 1)

--
assignee: trent
messages: 168885
nosy: trent
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15765] test_getcwd_long_pathnames (in test_posix) kills NetBSD

2012-08-22 Thread Stefan Krah

Stefan Krah added the comment:

The timeouts on NetBSD and OpenBSD are very likely related to
bugs in the user-space thread libraries. See also #8714.

I would recommend running these bots --without-threads.

--
nosy: +skrah

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15765
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com