Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I assume you wanted to close this too.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1581
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Looking at this patch, I definitely agree with the need for
documentation.And a test case which uses the SafeTransport class.
But the patch itself also needs a bit more work. (It uses httplib.HTTPS
underneath, and that needs more work,
Bill Janssen [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
No test case. No provision for client validation of server certificate.
--
resolution: - rejected
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1581
__
Sean Reifschneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
This patch also needs to include a patch to the documentation.
Martin: Do you agree with the discussion on the changes for 2.6?
--
nosy: +jafo
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas Hasenack added the comment:
The only difference between xmlrpclib.py from trunk and 2.5.1 is in the
Marshaller class. Unrelated, as far as I can see.
Note that it seems that the intent of the original code was to support
this x509-dict all along:
$ grep -n x509 xmlrpclib.py.trunk
1224:
New submission from Andreas Hasenack:
I was trying to use xmlrpclib.ServerProxy() with https and client
certificate validation (I know httplib doesn't do server certificate
validation yet). I found no way to pass on host/uri as a
(host,x509_dict) tuple as the connection methods support, so I
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
This should be considered for 2.6, not 2.5 (which is in feature freeze).
I'm hoping Bill Janssen can review this.
--
assignee: - janssen
nosy: +gvanrossum, janssen
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
I would like to ask the submitter to review the code himself for
suitability in 2.6. The underlying API has been extended a lot, so it's
unlikely that this patch is still the best choice.
--
nosy: +loewis
__
Tracker
