[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-10-07 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset e4598364ea29 by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.2':
Issue #14783: Improve int() docstring and also str(), range(), and slice().
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e4598364ea29

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-30 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Chris (cvrebert), feel free to create a new issue to improve the int() docs 
further.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-30 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset ed76eac4491e by Chris Jerdonek in branch '2.7':
Close #16036: Backport 3.x documentation improvement.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ed76eac4491e

--
resolution:  -> fixed
stage: patch review -> committed/rejected
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-30 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

[Django/Rietveld is erroring out for me when I try to reply there, so replying 
here]

On 2012/10/01 01:45:03, cvrebert wrote:
> Doc/library/functions.rst:636: arguments are given.  If *x* is a number, 
> return
> :meth:`x.__int__()
> How is "number-ness" determined? Are we just assuming anything with an 
> __int__()
> method is a number for purposes of explanation?

cvrebert, this patch has already been committed to 3.x.  Maybe open a new issue 
if you think the language can be improved further?  (Feel free to add me to the 
nosy list.)  This issue was originally focused more on updating just the 
signature line (along with any consequent changes to the text).

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-29 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Attaching patch updated for backport to 2.7.

In cases where the 2.7 language was substantively different, I preserved the 
2.7 language (e.g. I preserved the reference to plain and long integers).  I 
also added the lone "0" prefix for octals, which is a difference from 3.x: 
``0o``/``0O``/``0``.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27351/issue-16036-5-27.patch

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-29 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

See the following comment to issue 16045 for a couple differences in the 
behavior of int() in 2.7:

http://bugs.python.org/issue16045#msg171595

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-28 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Leaving open until the change is made in 2.7 (the current wording is somewhat 
different there).  I will do that in the next day or so.

--
versions: +Python 2.7

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-28 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 9205277bc008 by Chris Jerdonek in branch '3.2':
Issue #16036: Improve documentation of built-in int()'s signature and arguments.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9205277bc008

New changeset 6ccb04c4cbae by Chris Jerdonek in branch 'default':
Issue #16036: Merge update from 3.2.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6ccb04c4cbae

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-27 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Attaching updated patch that clarifies the accepted non-numeric types as Serhiy 
suggested on Rietveld.

I also made a few other changes like linking to "integer literal" and updating 
the "base-radix" reference.  As I began to suspect, the latter was left over 
from a prior version of the docs (when the keyword argument was named "radix"):

http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/18db8c4d4487/Doc/library/functions.rst#l559

I will commit later today unless there are further suggestions.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27321/issue-16036-4-default.patch

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-26 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Ezio, do you want to commit this or should I?

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-26 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

Good improvement.  LGTM.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-26 Thread Éric Araujo

Éric Araujo added the comment:

Latest patch LGTM.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-26 Thread Ezio Melotti

Ezio Melotti added the comment:

The latest patch is better, however I think it can be further improved.

The text is currently divided in two paragraphs:
 1) covers int(), int(num), int(x, base=b);
 2) covers int(float), and int(x, base=b);

I think it would be better to cover first int(), int(num), int(float), and then 
cover int(x, base=b).  The attached patch does this.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27313/issue16036.diff

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-25 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

I'm attaching an updated patch that does not cover certain edge cases that may 
differ for other Python implementations (and in fact does differ for PyPY).

See issue 16045 for more information.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27307/issue-16036-2-default.patch

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-25 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek added the comment:

[Continuing the issue 14783 discussion]

> That said, I don't have a strong opinion about this, so if people think that 
> x should be used, it's fine with me.

I also feel that *x* should be used, since that is what the code enforces.

I'm attaching a revised patch.  This patch also makes related adjustments to 
the corresponding text.

--
keywords: +needs review, patch
stage:  -> patch review
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file27294/issue-16036-1-default.patch

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue16036] simplify int() signature docs

2012-09-25 Thread Chris Jerdonek

New submission from Chris Jerdonek:

This issue is to simplify the documentation of the built-in function int()'s 
signature:

int([number | string[, base]])

and to make any needed changes to the text of the docs as a consequence.  
Discussion around this issue began in the comments to issue 14783 about int() 
and str()'s docstrings.

[I copied the nosy list from that issue.]

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
keywords: easy
messages: 171238
nosy: chris.jerdonek, cvrebert, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, 
georg.brandl, rhettinger, storchaka, terry.reedy, tshepang
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: simplify int() signature docs
type: enhancement
versions: Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com