[issue1746] ZIP files with archive comments longer than 4k not recognized as valid by zipfile module

2008-07-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: The patch in #1622 was committed as r64688. -- nosy: +loewis resolution: duplicate -> fixed ___ Python tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __

[issue1746] ZIP files with archive comments longer than 4k not recognized as valid by zipfile module

2008-03-17 Thread Sean Reifschneider
Changes by Sean Reifschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: -- priority: -> normal resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ __

[issue1746] ZIP files with archive comments longer than 4k not recognized as valid by zipfile module

2008-01-15 Thread Jesús Cea Avión
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión: -- nosy: +jcea __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python

[issue1746] ZIP files with archive comments longer than 4k not recognized as valid by zipfile module

2008-01-12 Thread Alan McIntyre
Alan McIntyre added the comment: A fix for this is included in the patch for issue 1622. __ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing l

[issue1746] ZIP files with archive comments longer than 4k not recognized as valid by zipfile module

2008-01-06 Thread Alan McIntyre
New submission from Alan McIntyre: The current behavior of zipfile._EndRecData is to look in the last 4k of data in a file if it appears it might have an archive comment; this results in flagging proper ZIP files with comments longer than ~4074 bytes as "not a ZIP file." I plan on posting a patc