Nikolaus Rath added the comment:
Thanks for looking at this! Attached is an updated patch with testcase (sorry,
I thought I had included testcases everywhere).
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33532/issue18574_rev2.patch
___
Python tracker
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 093ab6c02ff4 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.3':
fix handling of 100-continue status code (closes #18574)
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/093ab6c02ff4
New changeset 20a2597d6653 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default':
merge 3.3 (#18574)
Nikolaus Rath added the comment:
I just realized that the Misc/NEWS entry is just utterly wrong (it is talking
abou the client, even though the bug is in the server), my apologies. Here's a
fixed one:
- Issue #18574: Added missing newline in 100-Continue reply from
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset d00ed6e7a823 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.3':
correct news entry for #18574
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d00ed6e7a823
New changeset cf0678c3b735 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default':
merge 3.3 (#18574)
Changes by Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us:
--
nosy: +ethan.furman
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18574
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
A test would be good.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18574
___
___
Nikolaus Rath added the comment:
*ping*
Is there anything wrong with the patch? What do I have to do to get it applied?
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file33360/issue18574.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Jesús Cea Avión j...@jcea.es:
--
nosy: +jcea
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18574
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +orsenthil
versions: -Python 3.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18574
___
___
New submission from Nikolaus Rath:
The handle_expect_100() implementation in BaseHTTPRequestHandler currently
calls send_response_only(100) followed by flush_headers(). However, even a 1xx
response is always followed by a (potentially empty) set of response headers
(cf.
Nikolaus Rath added the comment:
The correct link is http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-10.1:
10.1 Informational 1xx
This class of status code indicates a provisional response,
consisting only of the Status-Line and optional headers, and is
terminated by an empty line.
11 matches
Mail list logo