[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2020-01-12 Thread Cheryl Sabella
Cheryl Sabella added the comment: @BTaskaya, thank you. I'm going to close this issue as a duplicate of that one. -- nosy: +cheryl.sabella resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> Improve the AST documentation

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2020-01-10 Thread Batuhan
Batuhan added the comment: @pablogsal is working on documenting nodes (not every node type that exists, the ones that aren't deprecated) in PR 17812 -- nosy: +BTaskaya, pablogsal ___ Python tracker

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-26 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: https://greentreesnakes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557 ___

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-26 Thread Georg Brandl
Georg Brandl added the comment: When citing a link, it's customary to give at least a comment *why* you are citing it. -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-26 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: SO link serves a proof that a problem is actual. It is needed, because, for example Brett doesn't think it is important. 2nd link is the same proof, and also an example of documentation wanted. -- ___ Python

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-26 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: In fact it may be the documentation that could be merged. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557 ___

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-24 Thread Brett Cannon
Changes by Brett Cannon br...@python.org: -- nosy: -brett.cannon ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-23 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8370132/what-syntax-is-represented-by-an-extslice-node-in-pythons-ast -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-22 Thread anatoly techtonik
anatoly techtonik added the comment: Neither you nor docs answer the question when Assign node gets Tuple as argument, when List and when Subscript. While it is obvious to you, I personally don't know what a Subscript is. This is the kind of stuff that I'd like to see documented. --

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-15 Thread Terry J. Reedy
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- components: -Devguide ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19557 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-12 Thread Brett Cannon
Brett Cannon added the comment: The node types are all listed right there in the docs in the abstract grammar section, so arguing they are incomplete I don't think is accurate. I'm willing to leave this open in case some ambitious person wants to write docs for every node type, but I think

[issue19557] ast - docs for every node type are missing

2013-11-11 Thread anatoly techtonik
New submission from anatoly techtonik: http://docs.python.org/2/library/ast.html AST module doc is incomplete. To write node visitor, you need to know possible types of parameters and expected values for every node type. They are different.