R. David Murray added the comment:
Are you referring to implementing rfc 3463 and rfc 5248 insofar as they are
applicable? That seems useful. I don't see anything in the RFC about the 'xab
x.y.z text' form of the message, though. Where is that documented? IMO these
messages should only be
Leslie P. Polzer added the comment:
The contents of conn are already stored by asyncore's socket attribute, so
there doesn't seem to be a need to keep it around. We should deprecate its
usage and refer the user to the socket attribute.
Furthermore I suggest renaming the conn argument to
