[issue19789] Improve wording of how to undo a call to logging.disable(lvl)

2013-11-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
Vinay Sajip added the comment: It's not the docstring in the code, it's the actual documentation. I propose to change it so that the documentation for disable will read: Provides an overriding level *lvl* for all loggers which takes precedence over the logger's own level. When the need arises

[issue19789] Improve wording of how to undo a call to logging.disable(lvl)

2013-11-30 Thread Simon Weber
Simon Weber added the comment: That sounds much clearer. Thanks! -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19789 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue19789] Improve wording of how to undo a call to logging.disable(lvl)

2013-11-30 Thread Roundup Robot
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset b6377ca8087a by Vinay Sajip in branch '2.7': Issue #19789: Clarified documentation for logging.disable. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b6377ca8087a New changeset 5c8130b85c17 by Vinay Sajip in branch '3.3': Issue #19789: Clarified documentation

[issue19789] Improve wording of how to undo a call to logging.disable(lvl)

2013-11-29 Thread Ezio Melotti
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +vinay.sajip ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19789 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue19789] Improve wording of how to undo a call to logging.disable(lvl)

2013-11-25 Thread Simon Weber
New submission from Simon Weber: In http://bugs.python.org/issue14864, this line was added to the logging.disable docstring: To undo the effect of a call to logging.disable(lvl), call logging.disable(logging.NOTSET). To prevent misunderstanding, I propose that this line be changed to: