[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Change by Irit Katriel : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset f869b56fe4be416d356fffc94b8b18fe65039929 by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.9': bpo-20281, bpo-29964: update datetime docs to refer %z and %Z to a pre-existing footnote (GH-30354)

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

miss-islington added the comment: New changeset 93dc1654dc3c925c062e19f0ef8587aa8961ef8a by Miss Islington (bot) in branch '3.10': bpo-20281, bpo-29964: update datetime docs to refer %z and %Z to a pre-existing footnote (GH-30354)

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +28810 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30609 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Change by miss-islington : -- nosy: +miss-islington nosy_count: 7.0 -> 8.0 pull_requests: +28808 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30608 ___ Python tracker

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Brett Cannon added the comment: New changeset 305588c67cdede4ef127ada90c1557bc1ef7c200 by Hugo van Kemenade in branch 'main': bpo-20281, bpo-29964: update datetime docs to refer %z and %Z to a pre-existing footnote (GH-30354)

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Change by Hugo van Kemenade : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +hugovk nosy_count: 6.0 -> 7.0 pull_requests: +28567 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/30354 ___ Python tracker

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Irit Katriel added the comment: See also Issue29964. -- ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue20281] [doc] time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z

Irit Katriel added the comment: Seems like the only thing to do on this issue is to add a reference to the footnote in the table entries for %z and %Z. -- components: +Library (Lib) keywords: +easy nosy: +iritkatriel title: time.strftime %z format specifier is the same as %Z -> [doc]