[issue20581] Incorrect behaviour of super() in a metaclass-created subclass

2014-02-25 Thread Ronald Oussoren
Changes by Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com: -- nosy: +ronaldoussoren ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20581 ___ ___

[issue20581] Incorrect behaviour of super() in a metaclass-created subclass

2014-02-10 Thread Jérémie Detrey
Changes by Jérémie Detrey jeremie.det...@loria.fr: -- versions: +Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20581 ___ ___

[issue20581] Incorrect behaviour of super() in a metaclass-created subclass

2014-02-10 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray added the comment: I don't think you can successfully use the no-argument version of super in this context. The no-argument form depends on compile-time magic, and you are mucking about with what object is what during the compilation phase. But I'm no expert on how super