[issue21767] singledispatch docs should explicitly mention support for abstract base classes

2019-11-19 Thread Łukasz Langa
Change by Łukasz Langa : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue21767] singledispatch docs should explicitly mention support for abstract base classes

2019-11-19 Thread Łukasz Langa
Łukasz Langa added the comment: New changeset 24555ce2f969bd69517011d23aaf8cc481090211 by Łukasz Langa (Batuhan Taşkaya) in branch 'master': bpo-21767: explicitly mention abc support in functools.singledispatch docs (#17171)

[issue21767] singledispatch docs should explicitly mention support for abstract base classes

2019-11-15 Thread Batuhan
Change by Batuhan : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +16680 stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/17171 ___ Python tracker

[issue21767] singledispatch docs should explicitly mention support for abstract base classes

2014-06-15 Thread Martin Panter
Changes by Martin Panter vadmium...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +vadmium ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21767 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue21767] singledispatch docs should explicitly mention support for abstract base classes

2014-06-14 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan: functools.singledispatch is integrated with the abc module for fast single dispatch even in the absence of concrete inheritance. However, this isn't obvious from the documentation, so users may not realise they can register a single ABC with the generic