Nick Coghlan added the comment:
With the only remaining issue here being the misbehaviour of the Set and
MutableSet ABCs when dealing with other types (the other issues in Armin's
original report were much simpler and fixed promptly), I'm closing this as a
duplicate of issue 8743 (where I
Changes by Yury Selivanov yselivanov...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Changes by Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +mark.dickinson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
Yes, I'll have a look shortly.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Raymond, will you have a chance to look at this before 3.4rc1? Otherwise I'd
like to take it.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
Changes by Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com:
--
nosy: +mdengler
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Nick Coghlan added the comment:
Armin pointed out in
http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2013/5/21/porting-to-python-3-redux/ that one nasty
consequence of the remaining part of this bug and issue 8743 is making it much
harder than it should be to use the ItemsView, KeysView and ValuesView from
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +ncoghlan
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing
Changes by Florent Xicluna florent.xicl...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +flox
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com:
--
assignee: stutzbach - rhettinger
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Ramchandra Apte added the comment:
Bump.
--
nosy: +ramchandra.apte
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com added the comment:
Raymond,
Do you have around 10 minutes today to look at the patch I submitted in Issue
8743? It appears to solve both this issue and that one, which have priorities
critical and high, respectively.
It's a reasonably small patch:
Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com added the comment:
Minor point of clarity: you mean __rand__ not __radd__, right? Set objects do
not support addition at all.
Adding the __rand__ methods to collections.Set in and of itself is
straightforward:
def __rsub__(self, other):
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
stage: - unit test needed
type: - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
Raymond Hettinger rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Yes, if you have a chance to think it through, it would be nice to get this
fixed-up.
--
assignee: - stutzbach
versions: -Python 3.1
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Daniel Stutzbach dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com added the comment:
3.1 is long gone. Should this be addressed for 3.2?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
nosy: +stutzbach
versions: +Python 3.2
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org added the comment:
I'm not going to get to this.
--
assignee: gvanrossum -
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
Changes by Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org:
--
nosy: -gvanrossum
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Recommend dealing with this in 3.1.
The __radd__ issue is non-trivial
and can't easily be dealt with at this point.
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
Barry A. Warsaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Thanks Raymond. Lowering the priority to critical and pushing this back
to 3.1.
--
priority: deferred blocker - critical
versions: +Python 3.1 -Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker [EMAIL
Changes by Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
priority: critical - release blocker
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Benjamin Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
Ping.
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
___
___
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment:
I'm setting this to critical to ensure that I will at least have a
thorough look at this before the release. I'm not sure whether I will
decide to address it or leave it alone.
--
priority: - critical
Changes by Armin Ronacher:
--
components: Library (Lib)
nosy: aronacher
severity: normal
status: open
title: Small _abcoll Bugs / Oddities
versions: Python 3.0
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
New submission from Armin Ronacher:
_abcoll.py references intertools.chain but doesn't import it. This
breaks Set subclasses. Additionally the abstract base classes don't
provide the right hand operator callbacks or how you want to call them.
So __add__ is there but __radd__ not which for
Georg Brandl added the comment:
I fixed the import in r61211.
Raymond, can you sort out the set operations?
--
assignee: - rhettinger
nosy: +georg.brandl, rhettinger
__
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue2226
Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
* Removed the dependency on itertools: r61213.
* Fixed nasty cut-and-paste error in Callable: r61214
Leaving the other one for Guido. I suspect the __radd__ style methods
are can of worms best left unopened for now. The right solution
probably involves
28 matches
Mail list logo
