[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2017-04-19 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> resolved status: open -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2017-04-19 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: New changeset d90045f319e2ea9772b9fbd62a05fdf34af96b6c by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'master': bpo-22352: Adjust widths in the output of dis.dis() for large line numbers and (#1153)

[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2017-04-15 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Proposed patch adjusts column widths of the output of dis.dis() for large line numbers and instruction offsets and adds tests for widths of opcode names. Unfortunately this test is failed for two new opcodes: BUILD_MAP_UNPACK_WITH_CALL and

[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2017-04-15 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- pull_requests: +1284 ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2015-06-27 Thread Nick Coghlan
Changes by Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com: -- assignee: ncoghlan - ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue22352 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue22352] Ensure opcode names and args fit in disassembly output

2014-09-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
New submission from Nick Coghlan: While exploring display options for issue 11822, I found that the new matrix multiplication opcode names (BINARY_MATRIX_MULTIPLY and INPLACE_MATRIX_MULTIPLY) don't fit in the nominal field width in the disassembly output (which is currently 20 characters).