[issue22955] Pickling of methodcaller and attrgetter

2014-11-27 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- assignee: -> serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue22955] Pickling of methodcaller and attrgetter

2014-11-27 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: I think this issue needs different solutions for 3.5 and maintained releases. We can implement the pickling of methodcaller, attrgetter and itemgetter in 3.5 (I agree this is good idea). And it would be good if pickling of these types will raise an exception

[issue22955] Pickling of methodcaller and attrgetter

2014-11-27 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Changes by Antoine Pitrou : -- nosy: +pitrou, serhiy.storchaka type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue22955] Pickling of methodcaller and attrgetter

2014-11-26 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Changes by Raymond Hettinger : -- stage: -> needs patch ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https:

[issue22955] Pickling of methodcaller and attrgetter

2014-11-26 Thread Antony Lee
New submission from Antony Lee: methodcaller and attrgetter objects seem to be picklable, but in fact the pickling is erroneous: >>> import operator, pickle >>> pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(operator.methodcaller("foo"))) Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: methodca