[issue23242] asyncio: Process must close the transport when the process exit

Alex Grönholm added the comment: Are you sure this has been fixed? The attached script reproduces the bug 100% reliably on my laptop. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file46198/read_subprocess.py ___ Python tracker

[issue23242] asyncio: Process must close the transport when the process exit

Changes by Alex Grönholm : -- nosy: +alex.gronholm versions: +Python 3.6 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue23242] asyncio: Process must close the transport when the process exit

STINNER Victor added the comment: I'm not sure that it's the most efficient way to close the transport. It may be better to close the transport in the connection_lost() method of the protocol. process_exited, not connection_lost. I implemented this option which is simpler and more

[issue23242] asyncio: Process must close the transport when the process exit

New submission from STINNER Victor: The asyncio.subprocess.Process class never closes the subprocess transport, whereas this transport is private. I propose to close the transport as soon as possible: when transport.get_returncode() is called and its result is not None. I'm not sure that