Larry Hastings added the comment:
I fixed it. My original attempted hack had bad regular expressions. Once my
regular expressions worked properly it was all fine.
--
resolution: -> fixed
stage: needs patch -> resolved
status: open -> closed
___
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Well, it's not a complicated script. You're welcome to try and debug it, but
if the bug is in the depths of new pydotorg, I don't know how easy it is to
find.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Using it with 3.5.0a2, it still printed the could not be processed error
message, but there's a new wrinkle: the one executable it processed, it added
incorrectly. The -amd64-webinstall exe was identified as Windows x86
executable installer.
--
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Attached for your reading pleasure.
--
keywords: +patch
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file38060/larry.add-to-pydotorg.exe.support.1.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Larry Hastings:
Steve is using new technology to make the installers for Windows. He generates
four installers now:
* .exe for Win32
* -amd64.exe for Win64
* -webinstall.exe for Win32 web-based installers
* -amd64-webinstall.exe for Win64 web-based installers
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I should add, adding the files by hand worked fine. (Which means that if you
experiment with the script, when it blows away the files and re-adds them,
you'll be blowing away the files I added by hand. So if you do so, it's up to
you to ensure the files are
Georg Brandl added the comment:
Can you attach the diff you made?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue23415
___
___
Python-bugs-list
