[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Support of pickling nested classes and methods with all protocols was added in issue23611. -- resolution: -> out of date stage: -> resolved status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker

[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka : -- status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https:

[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Could you please provide full example that you want to work and test it in Python 3.5? I suppose your issue is fixed in 3.5. -- nosy: +serhiy.storchaka ___ Python tracker __

[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Davin Potts added the comment: The runnable example in the attached file, issue_23513_play.py, suggests a way to preserve the inheritance of the Result class in any subclasses of Thing yet leaves the definition of Thing.worker as the OP first had it (in the most straightforward way). In creat

[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Changes by Davin Potts : -- nosy: +davin ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.or

[issue23513] Add support for classes/object model in multiprocessing/pickle

Cezary Wagner added the comment: I am fighting with multiprocessing and still not won - I need to invent new Python coding style to use it and can not reduce ugly code/microcoding. It is not because it is not possible to do it in Python easier but because it is not improved yet. -- _