[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

Berker Peksag added the comment: I've now added a warning to the document. -- stage: needs patch -> resolved status: pending -> closed ___ Python tracker ___

[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

Changes by Ezio Melotti : -- resolution: -> third party status: open -> pending ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing l

[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

Berker Peksag added the comment: IMHO, it can stay as a historical document. We just need to add a note to point out the correct documentation. So I think this can be handled on GitHub. I can't update the content since I don't have edit rights, so please open a new issue at https://github.com/

[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: This tracker can only handle changes to the docs. Deleting a web page would be an issue for the python.org tracker on github. But we should not make a request there until the docs have been checked and we are sure it should go. -- stage: -> needs pa

[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

Terry J. Reedy added the comment: "Unfortunately, new-style classes have not yet been integrated into Python's standard documention" is not even true for 2.7. I think the page should be deleted. Any of the reverences that are both useful and not in the docs could be added to the docs. -

[issue23762] python.org page on new-style classes should be updated

New submission from Joël Schaerer: This page (found it via a search engine): https://www.python.org/doc/newstyle/ is supposed to give the status of "New-style classes". However this information is no longer relevant for Python 3, and my needlessly scare newcomers. I believe it should be eithe