[issue2599] allow field_name in format strings to default to next positional argument (e.g., {})

2009-03-28 Thread R. David Murray
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment: This was proposed on python-ideas, discussed, approved, and implemented for 2.7 and 3.1. Note that although this wasn't discussed, the internationalization issue is answered by the fact that when internationalizing, you are rewriting the

[issue2599] allow field_name in format strings to default to next positional argument (e.g., {})

2008-04-09 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
Alexander Belopolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] added the comment: Omitting the ordinals from {} format units will present a problem with internationalization because the arguments may need to be rendered in different order in different languages. This is a frequent problem with the % formats and it is

[issue2599] allow field_name in format strings to default to next positional argument (e.g., {})

2008-04-08 Thread Bruce Frederiksen
New submission from Bruce Frederiksen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Being forced to number the arguments when using positional arguments in a format string is difficult to maintain. Adding an argument to the format string either requires renumbering all subsequent arguments, or using an out of sequence