[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2020-12-19 Thread tianc777
Change by tianc777 <18702287...@163.com>: -- nosy: +tianc777 nosy_count: 9.0 -> 10.0 pull_requests: +22727 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23865 ___ Python tracker

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2020-12-19 Thread Roundup Robot
Change by Roundup Robot : -- keywords: +patch nosy: +python-dev nosy_count: 8.0 -> 9.0 pull_requests: +22726 pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/23864 ___ Python tracker

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2018-03-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Antoine Pitrou added the comment: Please note the PR here has some review comments that need addressing. Also, it needs its conflicts with git master resolved. I'm cc'ing Thomas Moreau, who has done a lot of work recently on the concurrent.futures internals. --

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2018-03-30 Thread Stephen ONeal
Stephen ONeal added the comment: My project we're going into the underlying _work_queue and blocking adding more elements based on unfinished_tasks to accomplish this, bubbling this up to the API would be a welcome addition. -- nosy:

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-03-31 Thread Raymond Hettinger
Raymond Hettinger added the comment: Prayslayer, please don't shove. Your PR request was responded to by Mariatta so it wasn't ignored. Making decisions about API expansions takes a while (making sure it fits the intended use, that it isn't a bug factory itself, that it is broadly useful,

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-03-31 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Changes by Mariatta Wijaya : -- stage: -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-03-24 Thread prayerslayer
prayerslayer added the comment: Ping. That's really a two-line change, can be easily reviewed in 15 minutes :) -- ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-03-06 Thread prayerslayer
prayerslayer added the comment: Hello again, there's a reviewed PR open for this issue and it hasn't even received authoritative feedback yet (ie whether or not you intend to support this feature at all). I would be very happy if a core dev could look over this change before everyone forgets

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-02-20 Thread Xiang Zhang
Changes by Xiang Zhang : -- nosy: +xiang.zhang ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-02-18 Thread Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard
Changes by Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard : -- nosy: +Jim Fasarakis-Hilliard ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-02-18 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Changes by Mariatta Wijaya : -- components: +Library (Lib) versions: +Python 3.7 ___ Python tracker ___

[issue29595] Expose max_queue_size in ThreadPoolExecutor

2017-02-17 Thread prayerslayer
New submission from prayerslayer: Hi! I think the ThreadPoolExecutor should allow to set the maximum size of the underlying queue. The situation I ran into recently was that I used ThreadPoolExecutor to parallelize AWS API calls; I had to move data from one S3 bucket to another (~150M