[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2019-11-30 Thread Batuhan 


Batuhan  added the comment:

PR 218 is closed and this issue looks like just created for that PR. If that PR 
is closed and there are nothing to do with this issue, maybe this can also be 
closed?

--
nosy: +BTaskaya

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-26 Thread Serhiy Storchaka 

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

And decorate this test class with test.support.cpython_only.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-23 Thread Xavier de Gaye 

Xavier de Gaye added the comment:

> Note that there is a bug in find_function() (it opens a file with default 
> encoding).

Please open an issue.

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-22 Thread Serhiy Storchaka 

Changes by Serhiy Storchaka :


--
nosy: +inada.naoki

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-22 Thread Serhiy Storchaka 

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

It would be better to move all tests for internal functions in separate 
TestCase class. It should be clear that this is testing of implementation 
details and we are free to change tests when change the implementation.

There are some tests for find_function(). They should be moved too. Note that 
there is a bug in find_function() (it opens a file with default encoding).

Tests for internal functions don't free us from testing the same functionality 
as a part of high level functions.

--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-21 Thread Roundup Robot 

Changes by Roundup Robot :


--
pull_requests: +182

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-19 Thread Xavier de Gaye 

Xavier de Gaye added the comment:

Please use one single PR only when the tests are focused on a single topic and 
can be collected in their own class. When the tests are focused on breakpoints 
for example.

--
nosy: +xdegaye

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-19 Thread Artem Muterko 

New submission from Artem Muterko:

I want to write unit tests for pdb module of stdlib. Should I create one pull 
request for entire module or should I split work into several pull requests?

--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue29598] Write unit tests for pdb module

2017-02-19 Thread Artem Muterko 

Changes by Artem Muterko :


--
components: Tests
nosy: Artem Muterko
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Write unit tests for pdb module
versions: Python 3.7

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com