[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Change by miss-islington : -- pull_requests: +8205 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Change by Andriy Maletsky : -- pull_requests: +8204 ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe:

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: Thanks Bo. I agree with Nick, this is a readability win for a common annoying to type otherwise case. -- resolution: -> fixed stage: patch review -> commit review status: open -> closed ___

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Gregory P. Smith added the comment: New changeset ce0f33d04528fcafc673a8707871f8430d8f7ce8 by Gregory P. Smith (Bo Bayles) in branch 'master': bpo-32102 Add "capture_output=True" to subprocess.run (GH-5149)

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Change by Gregory P. Smith : -- assignee: -> gregory.p.smith ___ Python tracker ___ ___

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Change by bbayles : -- nosy: +bbayles ___ Python tracker ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Change by bbayles : -- keywords: +patch pull_requests: +5015 stage: needs patch -> patch review ___ Python tracker ___

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

Barry A. Warsaw added the comment: Yeah, I find it pretty common to set both stdout and stderr to PIPE, but I'm with you in hesitating to add YAO to the subprocess API. If you do move forward with this though, I think capture_output would have to be mutually exclusive to

[issue32102] Add "capture_output=True" option to subprocess.run

New submission from Nick Coghlan : I'm hesitant to suggest adding yet-another-option to any subprocess API, but I'm thinking it may be worth it in this case. The idea is to make it possible to replace: result = subprocess.run(cmd, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE) with: